Sw360Storage: Omit return types for function expressions

[sschuberth]

Omit return types in a few simple cases, partly to be able to improve
formatting.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth sebastian.schuberth@bosch.io

[oheger-bosch]

Personally, I prefer having explicit return types as they reduce the cognitive load somewhat. But if omitting them is common convention, I do not object.

[sschuberth]

Personally, I prefer having explicit return types as they reduce the cognitive load somewhat. But if omitting them is common convention, I do not object.

To be fair, I wouldn't says it's "common convention"; in fact, I believe there even are IDE hints sometimes that suggest to add explicit return types in public APIs to make API breakages more obvious. It's just my personal preference to omit explicit return types in simple cases (i.e. where the "cognitive load" is low) for a simpler visual appearance.

Does that change your mind now @oheger-bosch, and would you prefer to withdraw your approval / me to drop this PR?

[oheger-bosch]

Does that change your mind now @oheger-bosch, and would you prefer to withdraw your approval / me to drop this PR?

I am pretty much indifferent. Just go ahead as you like.