make sure %license is SPDX compatible #2026
Conversation
|
Build succeeded. ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 26s |
``` $ askalono crawl LICENSE LICENSE License: MIT (original text) Score: 1.000 ``` https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1 The changelog should propagate to dist-git as the SPDX migration initiative tracks 'spdx' string in changelogs. I'm at the SPDX hackfest right now and the guidance I got about the LICENSE Copyright line was: 1. it's meaningless and a waste of time to polish 2. only the "copyright" word has a meaning 3. the year is meaningless, hence I dropped it 4. the team name & authors is relevant so I updated it to match 100% what we have in the source files Signed-off-by: Tomas Tomecek <ttomecek@redhat.com>
TomasTomecek
force-pushed
the
update-license
branch
from
6f56fa5
to
2ae1e45
Compare
|
Build succeeded. ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 32s |
|
Build succeeded (gate pipeline). ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 30s |
softwarefactory-project-zuul
bot
merged commit b15908b
into
packit:main
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1
The changelog should propagate to dist-git as the SPDX migration
initiative tracks 'spdx' string in changelogs.
I'm at the SPDX hackfest right now and the guidance I got about the
LICENSE Copyright line was:
what we have in the source files
RELEASE NOTES BEGIN
Packit's license in RPM specfile is now confirmed to be SPDX compatible.
RELEASE NOTES END