-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Click to Readme #1157
Comments
I vote for removing the whole section, it duplicates information found in |
Is Click needed? |
It will be required for 1.0 |
Does anybody object against removing the first sentence of that section and rephrase it to the following:
|
|
@MikeiLL It will be installing 0.10.1 from PyPI not 1.0 |
very cool. On Sep 17, 2014, at 12:52 AM, Joe Doherty wrote:
|
@untitaker I agree, the information is redundant as it is (and should be) specified in the I have another proposal though, what about reworking/rewriting the whole I would be glad to start a new issue and come up with a draft to an improvement, what do you guys think about this idea? |
Armin said once the reason he prefers plaintext READMEs is because
I can agree with that, but this also makes embedding Travis badges impossible, which i consider important, see https://github.com/pocoo/metaflask/issues/59. For Werkzeug, we still made it a rst file, but nevertheless i don't think any additional content would be accepted. |
@untitaker okay, thanks for taking it up though.. |
That said, i don't see a reason why the README couldn't be rst. You'll have to negotiate this with Armin directly, he's the one who has a strong opinion on this. (Best reachable through IRC) |
Addresses concerns presented in issue pallets#1157
Under What do I need? click should also be listed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: