Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Segfault accessing memory read buffer #1

Closed
somename11111 opened this issue Nov 22, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

Segfault accessing memory read buffer #1

somename11111 opened this issue Nov 22, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@somename11111
Copy link

Hi there,

I'm getting a segfault when accessing the buffer passed to mem_read_callback() function, e.g. using the panda_syscalls plugin.

This is the command I used:
x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 ~/vmi/vms/xp.qcow2 -monitor stdio -loadvm booted -panda-plugin x86_64-softmmu/panda_plugins/panda_syscalls.so

This is the error message in syslog:
kernel: [22643.333306] qemu-system-x86[29152]: segfault at 7fc0616231e0 ip 00007fc0616231e0 sp 00007fc05e420608 error 15

The host os is ubuntu 12.04. The guest os is windows xp sp2.

OT: Thanks for developing PANDA, it's exactly what I was looking for for my project.

@moyix
Copy link
Collaborator

moyix commented Nov 25, 2013

I think the issue is that the syscalls plugin currently uses a hardcoded path of /scratch/syscalls.txt. There was also a bug in the plugin that would cause it to crash if that path didn't exist. I just committed a change:

moyix/panda@bc05059

This should at least cause it to print a sensible error message instead of crashing. In the future we will modify the plugin so that the log file is specified on the command line.

Let me know if creating a writable "/scratch" (or changing the path in qemu/panda_plugins/syscalls/syscalls.c) fixes your issue.

@moyix
Copy link
Collaborator

moyix commented Dec 10, 2013

Closing this as I haven't heard back, feel free to re-open if necessary.

@moyix moyix closed this as completed Dec 10, 2013
moyix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 31, 2016
Fix typo, memstrings instead of memstats
phulin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2017
Current code that handles Tx buffer desciprtor ring scanning employs the
following algorithm:

	1. Restore current buffer descriptor pointer from TBPTRn

	2. Process current descriptor

	3. If current descriptor has BD_WRAP flag set set current
	   descriptor pointer to start of the descriptor ring

	4. If current descriptor points to start of the ring exit the
	   loop, otherwise increment current descriptor pointer and go
	   to #2

	5. Store current descriptor in TBPTRn

The way the code is implemented results in buffer descriptor ring being
scanned starting at offset/descriptor #0. While covering 99% of the
cases, this algorithm becomes problematic for a number of edge cases.

Consider the following scenario: guest OS driver initializes descriptor
ring to N individual descriptors and starts sending data out. Depending
on the volume of traffic and probably guest OS driver implementation it
is possible that an edge case where a packet, spread across 2
descriptors is placed in descriptors N - 1 and 0 in that order(it is
easy to imagine similar examples involving more than 2 descriptors).

What happens then is aforementioned algorithm starts at descriptor 0,
sees a descriptor marked as BD_LAST, which it happily sends out as a
separate packet(very much malformed at this point) then the iteration
continues and the first part of the original packet is tacked to the
next transmission which ends up being bogus as well.

This behvaiour can be pretty reliably observed when scp'ing data from a
guest OS via TAP interface for files larger than 160K (every time for
700K+).

This patch changes the scanning algorithm to do the following:

	1. Restore "current" buffer descriptor pointer from
	   TBPTRn

	2. If "current" descriptor does not have BD_TX_READY set, goto #6

	3. Process current descriptor

	4. If "current" descriptor has BD_WRAP flag set "current"
	   descriptor pointer to start of the descriptor ring otherwise
	   set increment "current" by the size of one descriptor

	5. Goto #1

	6. Save "current" buffer descriptor in TBPTRn

This way we preserve the information about which descriptor was
processed last and always start where we left off avoiding the original
problem. On top of that, judging by the following excerpt from
MPC8548ERM (p. 14-48):

"... When the end of the TxBD ring is reached, eTSEC initializes TBPTRn
to the value in the corresponding TBASEn. The TBPTR register is
internally written by the eTSEC’s DMA controller during
transmission. The pointer increments by eight (bytes) each time a
descriptor is closed successfully by the eTSEC..."

revised algorithm might also a more correct way of emulating this aspect
of eTSEC peripheral.

Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
phulin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2017
QEMU will crash with the follow backtrace if the new created thread exited before
we call qemu_thread_set_name() for it.

  (gdb) bt
  #0 0x00007f9a68b095d7 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
  #1 0x00007f9a68b0acc8 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:90
  #2 0x00007f9a69cda389 in PAT_abort () from /usr/lib64/libuvpuserhotfix.so
  #3 0x00007f9a69cdda0d in patchIllInsHandler () from /usr/lib64/libuvpuserhotfix.so
  #4 <signal handler called>
  #5 pthread_setname_np (th=140298470549248, name=name@entry=0x8cc74a "io-task-worker") at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pthread_setname.c:49
  #6 0x00000000007f5f20 in qemu_thread_set_name (thread=thread@entry=0x7ffd2ac09680, name=name@entry=0x8cc74a "io-task-worker") at util/qemu_thread_posix.c:459
  #7 0x00000000007f679e in qemu_thread_create (thread=thread@entry=0x7ffd2ac09680, name=name@entry=0x8cc74a "io-task-worker",start_routine=start_routine@entry=0x7c1300 <qio_task_thread_worker>, arg=arg@entry=0x7f99b8001720, mode=mode@entry=1) at util/qemu_thread_posix.c:498
  #8 0x00000000007c15b6 in qio_task_run_in_thread (task=task@entry=0x7f99b80033d0, worker=worker@entry=0x7bd920 <qio_channel_socket_connect_worker>, opaque=0x7f99b8003370, destroy=0x7c6220 <qapi_free_SocketAddress>) at io/task.c:133
  #9 0x00000000007bda04 in qio_channel_socket_connect_async (ioc=0x7f99b80014c0, addr=0x37235d0, callback=callback@entry=0x54ad00 <qemu_chr_socket_connected>, opaque=opaque@entry=0x38118b0, destroy=destroy@entry=0x0) at io/channel_socket.c:191
  #10 0x00000000005487f6 in socket_reconnect_timeout (opaque=0x38118b0) at qemu_char.c:4402
  #11 0x00007f9a6a1533b3 in g_timeout_dispatch () from /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #12 0x00007f9a6a15299a in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #13 0x0000000000747386 in glib_pollfds_poll () at main_loop.c:227
  #14 0x0000000000747424 in os_host_main_loop_wait (timeout=404000000) at main_loop.c:272
  #15 0x0000000000747575 in main_loop_wait (nonblocking=nonblocking@entry=0) at main_loop.c:520
  #16 0x0000000000557d31 in main_loop () at vl.c:2170
  #17 0x000000000041c8b7 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>, envp=<optimized out>) at vl.c:5083

Let's detach the new thread after calling qemu_thread_set_name().

Signed-off-by: Caoxinhua <caoxinhua@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <1483493521-9604-1-git-send-email-zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
phulin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2017
AioHandlers marked ->is_external must be skipped when aio_node_check()
fails.  bdrv_drained_begin() needs this to prevent dataplane from
submitting new I/O requests while another thread accesses the device and
relies on it being quiesced.

This patch fixes the following segfault:

  Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  #0  0x00005577f6127dad in bdrv_io_plug (bs=0x5577f7ae52f0) at qemu/block/io.c:2650
  2650            bdrv_io_plug(child->bs);
  [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7ff5c4bd1c80 (LWP 10917))]
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x00005577f6127dad in bdrv_io_plug (bs=0x5577f7ae52f0) at qemu/block/io.c:2650
  #1  0x00005577f6114363 in blk_io_plug (blk=0x5577f7b8ba20) at qemu/block/block-backend.c:1561
  #2  0x00005577f5d4091d in virtio_blk_handle_vq (s=0x5577f9ada030, vq=0x5577f9b3d2a0) at qemu/hw/block/virtio-blk.c:589
  #3  0x00005577f5d4240d in virtio_blk_data_plane_handle_output (vdev=0x5577f9ada030, vq=0x5577f9b3d2a0) at qemu/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c:158
  #4  0x00005577f5d88acd in virtio_queue_notify_aio_vq (vq=0x5577f9b3d2a0) at qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:1304
  #5  0x00005577f5d8aaaf in virtio_queue_host_notifier_aio_poll (opaque=0x5577f9b3d308) at qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:2134
  #6  0x00005577f60ca077 in run_poll_handlers_once (ctx=0x5577f79ddbb0) at qemu/aio-posix.c:493
  #7  0x00005577f60ca268 in try_poll_mode (ctx=0x5577f79ddbb0, blocking=true) at qemu/aio-posix.c:569
  #8  0x00005577f60ca331 in aio_poll (ctx=0x5577f79ddbb0, blocking=true) at qemu/aio-posix.c:601
  #9  0x00005577f612722a in bdrv_flush (bs=0x5577f7c20970) at qemu/block/io.c:2403
  #10 0x00005577f60c1b2d in bdrv_close (bs=0x5577f7c20970) at qemu/block.c:2322
  #11 0x00005577f60c20e7 in bdrv_delete (bs=0x5577f7c20970) at qemu/block.c:2465
  #12 0x00005577f60c3ecf in bdrv_unref (bs=0x5577f7c20970) at qemu/block.c:3425
  #13 0x00005577f60bf951 in bdrv_root_unref_child (child=0x5577f7a2de70) at qemu/block.c:1361
  #14 0x00005577f6112162 in blk_remove_bs (blk=0x5577f7b8ba20) at qemu/block/block-backend.c:491
  #15 0x00005577f6111b1b in blk_remove_all_bs () at qemu/block/block-backend.c:245
  #16 0x00005577f60c1db6 in bdrv_close_all () at qemu/block.c:2382
  #17 0x00005577f5e60cca in main (argc=20, argv=0x7ffea6eb8398, envp=0x7ffea6eb8440) at qemu/vl.c:4684

The key thing is that bdrv_close() uses bdrv_drained_begin() and
virtio_queue_host_notifier_aio_poll() must not be called.

Thanks to Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> for identifying the root cause of
this crash.

Reported-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Message-id: 20170124095350.16679-1-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
moyix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2017
update from original repository
nathanjackson pushed a commit to nathanjackson/panda that referenced this issue Jan 21, 2019
ASAN detects an "unknown-crash" when running pxe-test:

/ppc64/pxe/spapr-vlan: =================================================================
==7143==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: unknown-crash on address 0x7f6dcd298d30 at pc 0x55e22218830d bp 0x7f6dcd2989e0 sp 0x7f6dcd2989d0
READ of size 128 at 0x7f6dcd298d30 thread T2
    #0 0x55e22218830c in tftp_session_allocate /home/elmarco/src/qq/slirp/tftp.c:73
    panda-re#1 0x55e22218a1f8 in tftp_handle_rrq /home/elmarco/src/qq/slirp/tftp.c:289
    panda-re#2 0x55e22218b54c in tftp_input /home/elmarco/src/qq/slirp/tftp.c:446
    panda-re#3 0x55e2221833fe in udp6_input /home/elmarco/src/qq/slirp/udp6.c:82
    panda-re#4 0x55e222137b17 in ip6_input /home/elmarco/src/qq/slirp/ip6_input.c:67

Address 0x7f6dcd298d30 is located in stack of thread T2 at offset 96 in frame
    #0 0x55e222182420 in udp6_input /home/elmarco/src/qq/slirp/udp6.c:13

  This frame has 3 object(s):
    [32, 48) '<unknown>'
    [96, 124) 'lhost' <== Memory access at offset 96 partially overflows this variable
    [160, 200) 'save_ip' <== Memory access at offset 96 partially underflows this variable

The sockaddr_storage pointer is the sockaddr_in6 lhost on the
stack. Copy only the source addr size.

Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
(cherry picked from commit 17eb587)
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
moyix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2019
Running postcopy-test with ASAN produces the following error:

QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=ppc64-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc64  tests/postcopy-test
...
=================================================================
==23641==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7f1556600000 at pc 0x55b8e9d28208 bp 0x7f1555f4d3c0 sp 0x7f1555f4d3b0
READ of size 8 at 0x7f1556600000 thread T6
    #0 0x55b8e9d28207 in htab_save_first_pass /home/elmarco/src/qq/hw/ppc/spapr.c:1528
    #1 0x55b8e9d2939c in htab_save_iterate /home/elmarco/src/qq/hw/ppc/spapr.c:1665
    #2 0x55b8e9beae3a in qemu_savevm_state_iterate /home/elmarco/src/qq/migration/savevm.c:1044
    #3 0x55b8ea677733 in migration_thread /home/elmarco/src/qq/migration/migration.c:1976
    #4 0x7f15845f46c9 in start_thread (/lib64/libpthread.so.0+0x76c9)
    #5 0x7f157d9d0f7e in clone (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x107f7e)

0x7f1556600000 is located 0 bytes to the right of 2097152-byte region [0x7f1556400000,0x7f1556600000)
allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x7f159bb76980 in posix_memalign (/lib64/libasan.so.3+0xc7980)
    #1 0x55b8eab185b2 in qemu_try_memalign /home/elmarco/src/qq/util/oslib-posix.c:106
    #2 0x55b8eab186c8 in qemu_memalign /home/elmarco/src/qq/util/oslib-posix.c:122
    #3 0x55b8e9d268a8 in spapr_reallocate_hpt /home/elmarco/src/qq/hw/ppc/spapr.c:1214
    #4 0x55b8e9d26e04 in ppc_spapr_reset /home/elmarco/src/qq/hw/ppc/spapr.c:1261
    #5 0x55b8ea12e913 in qemu_system_reset /home/elmarco/src/qq/vl.c:1697
    #6 0x55b8ea13fa40 in main /home/elmarco/src/qq/vl.c:4679
    #7 0x7f157d8e9400 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x20400)

Thread T6 created by T0 here:
    #0 0x7f159bae0488 in __interceptor_pthread_create (/lib64/libasan.so.3+0x31488)
    #1 0x55b8eab1d9cb in qemu_thread_create /home/elmarco/src/qq/util/qemu-thread-posix.c:465
    #2 0x55b8ea67874c in migrate_fd_connect /home/elmarco/src/qq/migration/migration.c:2096
    #3 0x55b8ea66cbb0 in migration_channel_connect /home/elmarco/src/qq/migration/migration.c:500
    #4 0x55b8ea678f38 in socket_outgoing_migration /home/elmarco/src/qq/migration/socket.c:87
    #5 0x55b8eaa5a03a in qio_task_complete /home/elmarco/src/qq/io/task.c:142
    #6 0x55b8eaa599cc in gio_task_thread_result /home/elmarco/src/qq/io/task.c:88
    #7 0x7f15823e38e6  (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x468e6)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow /home/elmarco/src/qq/hw/ppc/spapr.c:1528 in htab_save_first_pass

index seems to be wrongly incremented, unless I miss something that
would be worth a comment.

Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
moyix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 8, 2019
During block job completion, nothing is preventing
block_job_defer_to_main_loop_bh from being called in a nested
aio_poll(), which is a trouble, such as in this code path:

    qmp_block_commit
      commit_active_start
        bdrv_reopen
          bdrv_reopen_multiple
            bdrv_reopen_prepare
              bdrv_flush
                aio_poll
                  aio_bh_poll
                    aio_bh_call
                      block_job_defer_to_main_loop_bh
                        stream_complete
                          bdrv_reopen

block_job_defer_to_main_loop_bh is the last step of the stream job,
which should have been "paused" by the bdrv_drained_begin/end in
bdrv_reopen_multiple, but it is not done because it's in the form of a
main loop BH.

Similar to why block jobs should be paused between drained_begin and
drained_end, BHs they schedule must be excluded as well.  To achieve
this, this patch forces draining the BH in BDRV_POLL_WHILE.

As a side effect this fixes a hang in block_job_detach_aio_context
during system_reset when a block job is ready:

    #0  0x0000555555aa79f3 in bdrv_drain_recurse
    #1  0x0000555555aa825d in bdrv_drained_begin
    #2  0x0000555555aa8449 in bdrv_drain
    #3  0x0000555555a9c356 in blk_drain
    #4  0x0000555555aa3cfd in mirror_drain
    #5  0x0000555555a66e11 in block_job_detach_aio_context
    #6  0x0000555555a62f4d in bdrv_detach_aio_context
    #7  0x0000555555a63116 in bdrv_set_aio_context
    #8  0x0000555555a9d326 in blk_set_aio_context
    #9  0x00005555557e38da in virtio_blk_data_plane_stop
    #10 0x00005555559f9d5f in virtio_bus_stop_ioeventfd
    #11 0x00005555559fa49b in virtio_bus_stop_ioeventfd
    #12 0x00005555559f6a18 in virtio_pci_stop_ioeventfd
    #13 0x00005555559f6a18 in virtio_pci_reset
    #14 0x00005555559139a9 in qdev_reset_one
    #15 0x0000555555916738 in qbus_walk_children
    #16 0x0000555555913318 in qdev_walk_children
    #17 0x0000555555916738 in qbus_walk_children
    #18 0x00005555559168ca in qemu_devices_reset
    #19 0x000055555581fcbb in pc_machine_reset
    #20 0x00005555558a4d96 in qemu_system_reset
    #21 0x000055555577157a in main_loop_should_exit
    #22 0x000055555577157a in main_loop
    #23 0x000055555577157a in main

The rationale is that the loop in block_job_detach_aio_context cannot
make any progress in pausing/completing the job, because bs->in_flight
is 0, so bdrv_drain doesn't process the block_job_defer_to_main_loop
BH. With this patch, it does.

Reported-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170418143044.12187-3-famz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
moyix pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 9, 2019
mariusmue added a commit to avatartwo/panda-dev that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2020
commenting calls to rr_checksum_memory_internal() to prevent Seg Fault
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2020
The following segfault is encountered if the NBD server closes the UNIX
domain socket immediately after negotiation:

  Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  #0  aio_co_schedule (ctx=0x0, co=0xd3c0ff2ef0) at util/async.c:441
  441       QSLIST_INSERT_HEAD_ATOMIC(&ctx->scheduled_coroutines,
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x000000d3c01a50f8 in aio_co_schedule (ctx=0x0, co=0xd3c0ff2ef0) at util/async.c:441
  #1  0x000000d3c012fa90 in nbd_coroutine_end (bs=bs@entry=0xd3c0fec650, request=<optimized out>) at block/nbd-client.c:207
  #2  0x000000d3c012fb58 in nbd_client_co_preadv (bs=0xd3c0fec650, offset=0, bytes=<optimized out>, qiov=0x7ffc10a91b20, flags=0) at block/nbd-client.c:237
  #3  0x000000d3c0128e63 in bdrv_driver_preadv (bs=bs@entry=0xd3c0fec650, offset=offset@entry=0, bytes=bytes@entry=512, qiov=qiov@entry=0x7ffc10a91b20, flags=0) at block/io.c:836
  #4  0x000000d3c012c3e0 in bdrv_aligned_preadv (child=child@entry=0xd3c0ff51d0, req=req@entry=0x7f31885d6e90, offset=offset@entry=0, bytes=bytes@entry=512, align=align@entry=1, qiov=qiov@entry=0x7ffc10a91b20, f
+lags=0) at block/io.c:1086
  #5  0x000000d3c012c6b8 in bdrv_co_preadv (child=0xd3c0ff51d0, offset=offset@entry=0, bytes=bytes@entry=512, qiov=qiov@entry=0x7ffc10a91b20, flags=flags@entry=0) at block/io.c:1182
  #6  0x000000d3c011cc17 in blk_co_preadv (blk=0xd3c0ff4f80, offset=0, bytes=512, qiov=0x7ffc10a91b20, flags=0) at block/block-backend.c:1032
  #7  0x000000d3c011ccec in blk_read_entry (opaque=0x7ffc10a91b40) at block/block-backend.c:1079
  #8  0x000000d3c01bbb96 in coroutine_trampoline (i0=<optimized out>, i1=<optimized out>) at util/coroutine-ucontext.c:79
  #9  0x00007f3196cb8600 in __start_context () at /lib64/libc.so.6

The problem is that nbd_client_init() uses
nbd_client_attach_aio_context() -> aio_co_schedule(new_context,
client->read_reply_co).  Execution of read_reply_co is deferred to a BH
which doesn't run until later.

In the mean time blk_co_preadv() can be called and nbd_coroutine_end()
calls aio_wake() on read_reply_co.  At this point in time
read_reply_co's ctx isn't set because it has never been entered yet.

This patch simplifies the nbd_co_send_request() ->
nbd_co_receive_reply() -> nbd_coroutine_end() lifecycle to just
nbd_co_send_request() -> nbd_co_receive_reply().  The request is "ended"
if an error occurs at any point.  Callers no longer have to invoke
nbd_coroutine_end().

This cleanup also eliminates the segfault because we don't call
aio_co_schedule() to wake up s->read_reply_co if sending the request
failed.  It is only necessary to wake up s->read_reply_co if a reply was
received.

Note this only happens with UNIX domain sockets on Linux.  It doesn't
seem possible to reproduce this with TCP sockets.

Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20170829122745.14309-2-stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3c2d518)
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2022
We can't know the caller read enough data in the memory pointed
by ext_hdr to cast it as a ip6_ext_hdr_routing.
Declare rt_hdr on the stack and fill it again from the iovec.

Since we already checked there is enough data in the iovec buffer,
simply add an assert() call to consume the bytes_read variable.

This fix a 2 bytes buffer overrun in eth_parse_ipv6_hdr() reported
by QEMU fuzzer:

  $ cat << EOF | ./qemu-system-i386 -M pc-q35-5.0 \
    -accel qtest -monitor none \
    -serial none -nographic -qtest stdio
  outl 0xcf8 0x80001010
  outl 0xcfc 0xe1020000
  outl 0xcf8 0x80001004
  outw 0xcfc 0x7
  write 0x25 0x1 0x86
  write 0x26 0x1 0xdd
  write 0x4f 0x1 0x2b
  write 0xe1020030 0x4 0x190002e1
  write 0xe102003a 0x2 0x0807
  write 0xe1020048 0x4 0x12077cdd
  write 0xe1020400 0x4 0xba077cdd
  write 0xe1020420 0x4 0x190002e1
  write 0xe1020428 0x4 0x3509d807
  write 0xe1020438 0x1 0xe2
  EOF
  =================================================================
  ==2859770==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffdef904902 at pc 0x561ceefa78de bp 0x7ffdef904820 sp 0x7ffdef904818
  READ of size 1 at 0x7ffdef904902 thread T0
      #0 0x561ceefa78dd in _eth_get_rss_ex_dst_addr net/eth.c:410:17
      #1 0x561ceefa41fb in eth_parse_ipv6_hdr net/eth.c:532:17
      #2 0x561cef7de639 in net_tx_pkt_parse_headers hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:228:14
      #3 0x561cef7dbef4 in net_tx_pkt_parse hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:273:9
      #4 0x561ceec29f22 in e1000e_process_tx_desc hw/net/e1000e_core.c:730:29
      #5 0x561ceec28eac in e1000e_start_xmit hw/net/e1000e_core.c:927:9
      #6 0x561ceec1baab in e1000e_set_tdt hw/net/e1000e_core.c:2444:9
      #7 0x561ceebf300e in e1000e_core_write hw/net/e1000e_core.c:3256:9
      #8 0x561cef3cd4cd in e1000e_mmio_write hw/net/e1000e.c:110:5

  Address 0x7ffdef904902 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 34 in frame
      #0 0x561ceefa320f in eth_parse_ipv6_hdr net/eth.c:486

    This frame has 1 object(s):
      [32, 34) 'ext_hdr' (line 487) <== Memory access at offset 34 overflows this variable
  HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism, swapcontext or vfork
        (longjmp and C++ exceptions *are* supported)
  SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow net/eth.c:410:17 in _eth_get_rss_ex_dst_addr
  Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
    0x10003df188d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df188e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df188f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18910: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
  =>0x10003df18920:[02]f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18930: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18940: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18950: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18960: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18970: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
    Addressable:           00
    Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
    Stack left redzone:      f1
    Stack right redzone:     f3
  ==2859770==ABORTING

Add the corresponding qtest case with the fuzzer reproducer.

FWIW GCC 11 similarly reported:

  net/eth.c: In function 'eth_parse_ipv6_hdr':
  net/eth.c:410:15: error: array subscript 'struct ip6_ext_hdr_routing[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct ip6_ext_hdr[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
    410 |     if ((rthdr->rtype == 2) && (rthdr->segleft == 1)) {
        |          ~~~~~^~~~~~~
  net/eth.c:485:24: note: while referencing 'ext_hdr'
    485 |     struct ip6_ext_hdr ext_hdr;
        |                        ^~~~~~~
  net/eth.c:410:38: error: array subscript 'struct ip6_ext_hdr_routing[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct ip6_ext_hdr[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
    410 |     if ((rthdr->rtype == 2) && (rthdr->segleft == 1)) {
        |                                 ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
  net/eth.c:485:24: note: while referencing 'ext_hdr'
    485 |     struct ip6_ext_hdr ext_hdr;
        |                        ^~~~~~~

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1879531
Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Reported-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
Fixes: eb70002 ("net_pkt: Extend packet abstraction as required by e1000e functionality")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2022
We can't know the caller read enough data in the memory pointed
by ext_hdr to cast it as a ip6_ext_hdr_routing.
Declare rt_hdr on the stack and fill it again from the iovec.

Since we already checked there is enough data in the iovec buffer,
simply add an assert() call to consume the bytes_read variable.

This fix a 2 bytes buffer overrun in eth_parse_ipv6_hdr() reported
by QEMU fuzzer:

  $ cat << EOF | ./qemu-system-i386 -M pc-q35-5.0 \
    -accel qtest -monitor none \
    -serial none -nographic -qtest stdio
  outl 0xcf8 0x80001010
  outl 0xcfc 0xe1020000
  outl 0xcf8 0x80001004
  outw 0xcfc 0x7
  write 0x25 0x1 0x86
  write 0x26 0x1 0xdd
  write 0x4f 0x1 0x2b
  write 0xe1020030 0x4 0x190002e1
  write 0xe102003a 0x2 0x0807
  write 0xe1020048 0x4 0x12077cdd
  write 0xe1020400 0x4 0xba077cdd
  write 0xe1020420 0x4 0x190002e1
  write 0xe1020428 0x4 0x3509d807
  write 0xe1020438 0x1 0xe2
  EOF
  =================================================================
  ==2859770==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffdef904902 at pc 0x561ceefa78de bp 0x7ffdef904820 sp 0x7ffdef904818
  READ of size 1 at 0x7ffdef904902 thread T0
      #0 0x561ceefa78dd in _eth_get_rss_ex_dst_addr net/eth.c:410:17
      #1 0x561ceefa41fb in eth_parse_ipv6_hdr net/eth.c:532:17
      #2 0x561cef7de639 in net_tx_pkt_parse_headers hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:228:14
      #3 0x561cef7dbef4 in net_tx_pkt_parse hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:273:9
      #4 0x561ceec29f22 in e1000e_process_tx_desc hw/net/e1000e_core.c:730:29
      #5 0x561ceec28eac in e1000e_start_xmit hw/net/e1000e_core.c:927:9
      #6 0x561ceec1baab in e1000e_set_tdt hw/net/e1000e_core.c:2444:9
      #7 0x561ceebf300e in e1000e_core_write hw/net/e1000e_core.c:3256:9
      #8 0x561cef3cd4cd in e1000e_mmio_write hw/net/e1000e.c:110:5

  Address 0x7ffdef904902 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 34 in frame
      #0 0x561ceefa320f in eth_parse_ipv6_hdr net/eth.c:486

    This frame has 1 object(s):
      [32, 34) 'ext_hdr' (line 487) <== Memory access at offset 34 overflows this variable
  HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism, swapcontext or vfork
        (longjmp and C++ exceptions *are* supported)
  SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow net/eth.c:410:17 in _eth_get_rss_ex_dst_addr
  Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
    0x10003df188d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df188e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df188f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18910: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
  =>0x10003df18920:[02]f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18930: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18940: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18950: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18960: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18970: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
    Addressable:           00
    Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
    Stack left redzone:      f1
    Stack right redzone:     f3
  ==2859770==ABORTING

Add the corresponding qtest case with the fuzzer reproducer.

FWIW GCC 11 similarly reported:

  net/eth.c: In function 'eth_parse_ipv6_hdr':
  net/eth.c:410:15: error: array subscript 'struct ip6_ext_hdr_routing[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct ip6_ext_hdr[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
    410 |     if ((rthdr->rtype == 2) && (rthdr->segleft == 1)) {
        |          ~~~~~^~~~~~~
  net/eth.c:485:24: note: while referencing 'ext_hdr'
    485 |     struct ip6_ext_hdr ext_hdr;
        |                        ^~~~~~~
  net/eth.c:410:38: error: array subscript 'struct ip6_ext_hdr_routing[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct ip6_ext_hdr[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
    410 |     if ((rthdr->rtype == 2) && (rthdr->segleft == 1)) {
        |                                 ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
  net/eth.c:485:24: note: while referencing 'ext_hdr'
    485 |     struct ip6_ext_hdr ext_hdr;
        |                        ^~~~~~~

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1879531
Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Reported-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
Fixes: eb70002 ("net_pkt: Extend packet abstraction as required by e1000e functionality")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2022
We can't know the caller read enough data in the memory pointed
by ext_hdr to cast it as a ip6_ext_hdr_routing.
Declare rt_hdr on the stack and fill it again from the iovec.

Since we already checked there is enough data in the iovec buffer,
simply add an assert() call to consume the bytes_read variable.

This fix a 2 bytes buffer overrun in eth_parse_ipv6_hdr() reported
by QEMU fuzzer:

  $ cat << EOF | ./qemu-system-i386 -M pc-q35-5.0 \
    -accel qtest -monitor none \
    -serial none -nographic -qtest stdio
  outl 0xcf8 0x80001010
  outl 0xcfc 0xe1020000
  outl 0xcf8 0x80001004
  outw 0xcfc 0x7
  write 0x25 0x1 0x86
  write 0x26 0x1 0xdd
  write 0x4f 0x1 0x2b
  write 0xe1020030 0x4 0x190002e1
  write 0xe102003a 0x2 0x0807
  write 0xe1020048 0x4 0x12077cdd
  write 0xe1020400 0x4 0xba077cdd
  write 0xe1020420 0x4 0x190002e1
  write 0xe1020428 0x4 0x3509d807
  write 0xe1020438 0x1 0xe2
  EOF
  =================================================================
  ==2859770==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffdef904902 at pc 0x561ceefa78de bp 0x7ffdef904820 sp 0x7ffdef904818
  READ of size 1 at 0x7ffdef904902 thread T0
      #0 0x561ceefa78dd in _eth_get_rss_ex_dst_addr net/eth.c:410:17
      #1 0x561ceefa41fb in eth_parse_ipv6_hdr net/eth.c:532:17
      #2 0x561cef7de639 in net_tx_pkt_parse_headers hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:228:14
      #3 0x561cef7dbef4 in net_tx_pkt_parse hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:273:9
      #4 0x561ceec29f22 in e1000e_process_tx_desc hw/net/e1000e_core.c:730:29
      #5 0x561ceec28eac in e1000e_start_xmit hw/net/e1000e_core.c:927:9
      #6 0x561ceec1baab in e1000e_set_tdt hw/net/e1000e_core.c:2444:9
      #7 0x561ceebf300e in e1000e_core_write hw/net/e1000e_core.c:3256:9
      #8 0x561cef3cd4cd in e1000e_mmio_write hw/net/e1000e.c:110:5

  Address 0x7ffdef904902 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 34 in frame
      #0 0x561ceefa320f in eth_parse_ipv6_hdr net/eth.c:486

    This frame has 1 object(s):
      [32, 34) 'ext_hdr' (line 487) <== Memory access at offset 34 overflows this variable
  HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism, swapcontext or vfork
        (longjmp and C++ exceptions *are* supported)
  SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow net/eth.c:410:17 in _eth_get_rss_ex_dst_addr
  Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
    0x10003df188d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df188e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df188f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18910: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
  =>0x10003df18920:[02]f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18930: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18940: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18950: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18960: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18970: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
    Addressable:           00
    Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
    Stack left redzone:      f1
    Stack right redzone:     f3
  ==2859770==ABORTING

Add the corresponding qtest case with the fuzzer reproducer.

FWIW GCC 11 similarly reported:

  net/eth.c: In function 'eth_parse_ipv6_hdr':
  net/eth.c:410:15: error: array subscript 'struct ip6_ext_hdr_routing[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct ip6_ext_hdr[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
    410 |     if ((rthdr->rtype == 2) && (rthdr->segleft == 1)) {
        |          ~~~~~^~~~~~~
  net/eth.c:485:24: note: while referencing 'ext_hdr'
    485 |     struct ip6_ext_hdr ext_hdr;
        |                        ^~~~~~~
  net/eth.c:410:38: error: array subscript 'struct ip6_ext_hdr_routing[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct ip6_ext_hdr[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
    410 |     if ((rthdr->rtype == 2) && (rthdr->segleft == 1)) {
        |                                 ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
  net/eth.c:485:24: note: while referencing 'ext_hdr'
    485 |     struct ip6_ext_hdr ext_hdr;
        |                        ^~~~~~~

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1879531
Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Reported-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
Fixes: eb70002 ("net_pkt: Extend packet abstraction as required by e1000e functionality")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 19, 2022
We can't know the caller read enough data in the memory pointed
by ext_hdr to cast it as a ip6_ext_hdr_routing.
Declare rt_hdr on the stack and fill it again from the iovec.

Since we already checked there is enough data in the iovec buffer,
simply add an assert() call to consume the bytes_read variable.

This fix a 2 bytes buffer overrun in eth_parse_ipv6_hdr() reported
by QEMU fuzzer:

  $ cat << EOF | ./qemu-system-i386 -M pc-q35-5.0 \
    -accel qtest -monitor none \
    -serial none -nographic -qtest stdio
  outl 0xcf8 0x80001010
  outl 0xcfc 0xe1020000
  outl 0xcf8 0x80001004
  outw 0xcfc 0x7
  write 0x25 0x1 0x86
  write 0x26 0x1 0xdd
  write 0x4f 0x1 0x2b
  write 0xe1020030 0x4 0x190002e1
  write 0xe102003a 0x2 0x0807
  write 0xe1020048 0x4 0x12077cdd
  write 0xe1020400 0x4 0xba077cdd
  write 0xe1020420 0x4 0x190002e1
  write 0xe1020428 0x4 0x3509d807
  write 0xe1020438 0x1 0xe2
  EOF
  =================================================================
  ==2859770==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7ffdef904902 at pc 0x561ceefa78de bp 0x7ffdef904820 sp 0x7ffdef904818
  READ of size 1 at 0x7ffdef904902 thread T0
      #0 0x561ceefa78dd in _eth_get_rss_ex_dst_addr net/eth.c:410:17
      #1 0x561ceefa41fb in eth_parse_ipv6_hdr net/eth.c:532:17
      #2 0x561cef7de639 in net_tx_pkt_parse_headers hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:228:14
      #3 0x561cef7dbef4 in net_tx_pkt_parse hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:273:9
      #4 0x561ceec29f22 in e1000e_process_tx_desc hw/net/e1000e_core.c:730:29
      #5 0x561ceec28eac in e1000e_start_xmit hw/net/e1000e_core.c:927:9
      #6 0x561ceec1baab in e1000e_set_tdt hw/net/e1000e_core.c:2444:9
      #7 0x561ceebf300e in e1000e_core_write hw/net/e1000e_core.c:3256:9
      #8 0x561cef3cd4cd in e1000e_mmio_write hw/net/e1000e.c:110:5

  Address 0x7ffdef904902 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 34 in frame
      #0 0x561ceefa320f in eth_parse_ipv6_hdr net/eth.c:486

    This frame has 1 object(s):
      [32, 34) 'ext_hdr' (line 487) <== Memory access at offset 34 overflows this variable
  HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism, swapcontext or vfork
        (longjmp and C++ exceptions *are* supported)
  SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow net/eth.c:410:17 in _eth_get_rss_ex_dst_addr
  Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
    0x10003df188d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df188e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df188f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18910: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
  =>0x10003df18920:[02]f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18930: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18940: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18950: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18960: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
    0x10003df18970: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
    Addressable:           00
    Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
    Stack left redzone:      f1
    Stack right redzone:     f3
  ==2859770==ABORTING

Add the corresponding qtest case with the fuzzer reproducer.

FWIW GCC 11 similarly reported:

  net/eth.c: In function 'eth_parse_ipv6_hdr':
  net/eth.c:410:15: error: array subscript 'struct ip6_ext_hdr_routing[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct ip6_ext_hdr[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
    410 |     if ((rthdr->rtype == 2) && (rthdr->segleft == 1)) {
        |          ~~~~~^~~~~~~
  net/eth.c:485:24: note: while referencing 'ext_hdr'
    485 |     struct ip6_ext_hdr ext_hdr;
        |                        ^~~~~~~
  net/eth.c:410:38: error: array subscript 'struct ip6_ext_hdr_routing[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct ip6_ext_hdr[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
    410 |     if ((rthdr->rtype == 2) && (rthdr->segleft == 1)) {
        |                                 ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
  net/eth.c:485:24: note: while referencing 'ext_hdr'
    485 |     struct ip6_ext_hdr ext_hdr;
        |                        ^~~~~~~

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1879531
Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Reported-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
Fixes: eb70002 ("net_pkt: Extend packet abstraction as required by e1000e functionality")
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2023
Receive/transmit/event vqs forgot to cleanup in vhost_vsock_unrealize. This
patch save receive/transmit vq pointer in realize() and cleanup vqs
through those vq pointers in unrealize(). The leak stack is as follow:

Direct leak of 21504 byte(s) in 3 object(s) allocated from:
  #0 0x7f86a1356970 (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)  ??:?
  #1 0x7f86a09aa49d (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)  ??:?
  #2 0x5604852f85ca (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c3e5ca)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:2333
  #3 0x560485356208 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c9c208)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c:339
  #4 0x560485305a17 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c4ba17)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:3531
  #5 0x5604858e6b65 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x322cb65)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:865
  #6 0x5604861e6c41 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x3b2cc41)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/qom/object.c:2102

Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20200115062535.50644-1-pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2023
Receive/transmit/event vqs forgot to cleanup in vhost_vsock_unrealize. This
patch save receive/transmit vq pointer in realize() and cleanup vqs
through those vq pointers in unrealize(). The leak stack is as follow:

Direct leak of 21504 byte(s) in 3 object(s) allocated from:
  #0 0x7f86a1356970 (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)  ??:?
  #1 0x7f86a09aa49d (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)  ??:?
  #2 0x5604852f85ca (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c3e5ca)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:2333
  #3 0x560485356208 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c9c208)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c:339
  #4 0x560485305a17 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c4ba17)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:3531
  #5 0x5604858e6b65 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x322cb65)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:865
  #6 0x5604861e6c41 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x3b2cc41)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/qom/object.c:2102

Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20200115062535.50644-1-pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2023
Currently offloads disabled by guest via the VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS_SET
command are not preserved on VM migration.
Instead all offloads reported by guest features (via VIRTIO_PCI_GUEST_FEATURES)
get enabled.
What happens is: first the VirtIONet::curr_guest_offloads gets restored and offloads
are getting set correctly:

 #0  qemu_set_offload (nc=0x555556a11400, csum=1, tso4=0, tso6=0, ecn=0, ufo=0) at net/net.c:474
 #1  virtio_net_apply_guest_offloads (n=0x555557701ca0) at hw/net/virtio-net.c:720
 #2  virtio_net_post_load_device (opaque=0x555557701ca0, version_id=11) at hw/net/virtio-net.c:2334
 #3  vmstate_load_state (f=0x5555569dc010, vmsd=0x555556577c80 <vmstate_virtio_net_device>, opaque=0x555557701ca0, version_id=11)
     at migration/vmstate.c:168
 #4  virtio_load (vdev=0x555557701ca0, f=0x5555569dc010, version_id=11) at hw/virtio/virtio.c:2197
 #5  virtio_device_get (f=0x5555569dc010, opaque=0x555557701ca0, size=0, field=0x55555668cd00 <__compound_literal.5>) at hw/virtio/virtio.c:2036
 #6  vmstate_load_state (f=0x5555569dc010, vmsd=0x555556577ce0 <vmstate_virtio_net>, opaque=0x555557701ca0, version_id=11) at migration/vmstate.c:143
 #7  vmstate_load (f=0x5555569dc010, se=0x5555578189e0) at migration/savevm.c:829
 #8  qemu_loadvm_section_start_full (f=0x5555569dc010, mis=0x5555569eee20) at migration/savevm.c:2211
 #9  qemu_loadvm_state_main (f=0x5555569dc010, mis=0x5555569eee20) at migration/savevm.c:2395
 #10 qemu_loadvm_state (f=0x5555569dc010) at migration/savevm.c:2467
 #11 process_incoming_migration_co (opaque=0x0) at migration/migration.c:449

However later on the features are getting restored, and offloads get reset to
everything supported by features:

 #0  qemu_set_offload (nc=0x555556a11400, csum=1, tso4=1, tso6=1, ecn=0, ufo=0) at net/net.c:474
 #1  virtio_net_apply_guest_offloads (n=0x555557701ca0) at hw/net/virtio-net.c:720
 #2  virtio_net_set_features (vdev=0x555557701ca0, features=5104441767) at hw/net/virtio-net.c:773
 #3  virtio_set_features_nocheck (vdev=0x555557701ca0, val=5104441767) at hw/virtio/virtio.c:2052
 #4  virtio_load (vdev=0x555557701ca0, f=0x5555569dc010, version_id=11) at hw/virtio/virtio.c:2220
 #5  virtio_device_get (f=0x5555569dc010, opaque=0x555557701ca0, size=0, field=0x55555668cd00 <__compound_literal.5>) at hw/virtio/virtio.c:2036
 #6  vmstate_load_state (f=0x5555569dc010, vmsd=0x555556577ce0 <vmstate_virtio_net>, opaque=0x555557701ca0, version_id=11) at migration/vmstate.c:143
 #7  vmstate_load (f=0x5555569dc010, se=0x5555578189e0) at migration/savevm.c:829
 #8  qemu_loadvm_section_start_full (f=0x5555569dc010, mis=0x5555569eee20) at migration/savevm.c:2211
 #9  qemu_loadvm_state_main (f=0x5555569dc010, mis=0x5555569eee20) at migration/savevm.c:2395
 #10 qemu_loadvm_state (f=0x5555569dc010) at migration/savevm.c:2467
 #11 process_incoming_migration_co (opaque=0x0) at migration/migration.c:449

Fix this by preserving the state in saved_guest_offloads field and
pushing out offload initialization to the new post load hook.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Sennikovsky <mikhail.sennikovskii@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2023
ivq/dvq/svq/free_page_vq is forgot to cleanup in
virtio_balloon_device_unrealize, the memory leak stack is as follow:

Direct leak of 14336 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f99fd9d8560 in calloc (/usr/lib64/libasan.so.3+0xc7560)
    #1 0x7f99fcb20015 in g_malloc0 (/usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x50015)
    #2 0x557d90638437 in virtio_add_queue hw/virtio/virtio.c:2327
    #3 0x557d9064401d in virtio_balloon_device_realize hw/virtio/virtio-balloon.c:793
    #4 0x557d906356f7 in virtio_device_realize hw/virtio/virtio.c:3504
    #5 0x557d9073f081 in device_set_realized hw/core/qdev.c:876
    #6 0x557d908b1f4d in property_set_bool qom/object.c:2080
    #7 0x557d908b655e in object_property_set_qobject qom/qom-qobject.c:26

Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <1575444716-17632-2-git-send-email-pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2023
Receive/transmit/event vqs forgot to cleanup in vhost_vsock_unrealize. This
patch save receive/transmit vq pointer in realize() and cleanup vqs
through those vq pointers in unrealize(). The leak stack is as follow:

Direct leak of 21504 byte(s) in 3 object(s) allocated from:
  #0 0x7f86a1356970 (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)  ??:?
  #1 0x7f86a09aa49d (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)  ??:?
  #2 0x5604852f85ca (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c3e5ca)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:2333
  #3 0x560485356208 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c9c208)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c:339
  #4 0x560485305a17 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c4ba17)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:3531
  #5 0x5604858e6b65 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x322cb65)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:865
  #6 0x5604861e6c41 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x3b2cc41)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/qom/object.c:2102

Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20200115062535.50644-1-pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2023
Similar to other virtio device(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11399237/), virtio queues forgot to delete in unrealize, and aslo error path in realize, this patch fix these memleaks, the leak stack is as follow:
Direct leak of 57344 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f15784fb970 in __interceptor_calloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)
    #1 0x7f157790849d in g_malloc0 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)
    #2 0x55587a1bf859 in virtio_add_queue /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:2333
    #3 0x55587a2071d5 in vuf_device_realize /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs.c:212
    #4 0x55587a1ae360 in virtio_device_realize /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:3531
    #5 0x55587a63fb7b in device_set_realized /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:891
    #6 0x55587acf03f5 in property_set_bool /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/object.c:2238
    #7 0x55587acfce0d in object_property_set_qobject /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/qom-qobject.c:26
    #8 0x55587acf5c8c in object_property_set_bool /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/object.c:1390
    #9 0x55587a8e22a2 in pci_qdev_realize /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/pci/pci.c:2095
    #10 0x55587a63fb7b in device_set_realized /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:891
    #11 0x55587acf03f5 in property_set_bool /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/object.c:2238
    #12 0x55587acfce0d in object_property_set_qobject /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/qom-qobject.c:26
    #13 0x55587acf5c8c in object_property_set_bool /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/object.c:1390
    #14 0x55587a496d65 in qdev_device_add /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qdev-monitor.c:679

Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200225075554.10835-2-pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2023
Similar to other virtio-deivces, ctrl_vq forgot to delete in virtio_crypto_device_unrealize, this patch fix it.
This device has aleardy maintained vq pointers. Thus, we use the new virtio_delete_queue function directly to do the cleanup.

The leak stack:
Direct leak of 10752 byte(s) in 3 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7f4c024b1970 in __interceptor_calloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)
    #1 0x7f4c018be49d in g_malloc0 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)
    #2 0x55a2f8017279 in virtio_add_queue /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:2333
    #3 0x55a2f8057035 in virtio_crypto_device_realize /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c:814
    #4 0x55a2f8005d80 in virtio_device_realize /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:3531
    #5 0x55a2f8497d1b in device_set_realized /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:891
    #6 0x55a2f8b48595 in property_set_bool /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/object.c:2238
    #7 0x55a2f8b54fad in object_property_set_qobject /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/qom-qobject.c:26
    #8 0x55a2f8b4de2c in object_property_set_bool /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/qom/object.c:1390
    #9 0x55a2f80609c9 in virtio_crypto_pci_realize /mnt/sdb/qemu-new/qemu_test/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c:58

Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Cc: "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20200225075554.10835-5-pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2023
The virtqueue code sets up MemoryRegionCaches to access the virtqueue
guest RAM data structures.  The code currently assumes that
VRingMemoryRegionCaches is initialized before device emulation code
accesses the virtqueue.  An assertion will fail in
vring_get_region_caches() when this is not true.  Device fuzzing found a
case where this assumption is false (see below).

Virtqueue guest RAM addresses can also be changed from a vCPU thread
while an IOThread is accessing the virtqueue.  This breaks the same
assumption but this time the caches could become invalid partway through
the virtqueue code.  The code fetches the caches RCU pointer multiple
times so we will need to validate the pointer every time it is fetched.

Add checks each time we call vring_get_region_caches() and treat invalid
caches as a nop: memory stores are ignored and memory reads return 0.

The fuzz test failure is as follows:

  $ qemu -M pc -device virtio-blk-pci,id=drv0,drive=drive0,addr=4.0 \
         -drive if=none,id=drive0,file=null-co://,format=raw,auto-read-only=off \
         -drive if=none,id=drive1,file=null-co://,file.read-zeroes=on,format=raw \
         -display none \
         -qtest stdio
  endianness
  outl 0xcf8 0x80002020
  outl 0xcfc 0xe0000000
  outl 0xcf8 0x80002004
  outw 0xcfc 0x7
  write 0xe0000000 0x24 0x00ffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffab5cffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffabffffffab0000000001
  inb 0x4
  writew 0xe000001c 0x1
  write 0xe0000014 0x1 0x0d

The following error message is produced:

  qemu-system-x86_64: /home/stefanha/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:286: vring_get_region_caches: Assertion `caches != NULL' failed.

The backtrace looks like this:

  #0  0x00007ffff5520625 in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6
  #1  0x00007ffff55098d9 in abort () at /lib64/libc.so.6
  #2  0x00007ffff55097a9 in _nl_load_domain.cold () at /lib64/libc.so.6
  #3  0x00007ffff5518a66 in annobin_assert.c_end () at /lib64/libc.so.6
  #4  0x00005555559073da in vring_get_region_caches (vq=<optimized out>) at qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:286
  #5  vring_get_region_caches (vq=<optimized out>) at qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:283
  #6  0x000055555590818d in vring_used_flags_set_bit (mask=1, vq=0x5555575ceea0) at qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:398
  #7  virtio_queue_split_set_notification (enable=0, vq=0x5555575ceea0) at qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:398
  #8  virtio_queue_set_notification (vq=vq@entry=0x5555575ceea0, enable=enable@entry=0) at qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:451
  #9  0x0000555555908512 in virtio_queue_set_notification (vq=vq@entry=0x5555575ceea0, enable=enable@entry=0) at qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:444
  #10 0x00005555558c697a in virtio_blk_handle_vq (s=0x5555575c57e0, vq=0x5555575ceea0) at qemu/hw/block/virtio-blk.c:775
  #11 0x0000555555907836 in virtio_queue_notify_aio_vq (vq=0x5555575ceea0) at qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:2244
  #12 0x0000555555cb5dd7 in aio_dispatch_handlers (ctx=ctx@entry=0x55555671a420) at util/aio-posix.c:429
  #13 0x0000555555cb67a8 in aio_dispatch (ctx=0x55555671a420) at util/aio-posix.c:460
  #14 0x0000555555cb307e in aio_ctx_dispatch (source=<optimized out>, callback=<optimized out>, user_data=<optimized out>) at util/async.c:260
  #15 0x00007ffff7bbc510 in g_main_context_dispatch () at /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  #16 0x0000555555cb5848 in glib_pollfds_poll () at util/main-loop.c:219
  #17 os_host_main_loop_wait (timeout=<optimized out>) at util/main-loop.c:242
  #18 main_loop_wait (nonblocking=<optimized out>) at util/main-loop.c:518
  #19 0x00005555559b20c9 in main_loop () at vl.c:1683
  #20 0x0000555555838115 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>, envp=<optimized out>) at vl.c:4441

Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Cc: Michael Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200207104619.164892-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
AndrewFasano pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2023
when s->inflight is freed, vhost_dev_free_inflight may try to access
s->inflight->addr, it will retrigger the following issue.

==7309==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x604001020d18 at pc 0x555555ce948a bp 0x7fffffffb170 sp 0x7fffffffb160
READ of size 8 at 0x604001020d18 thread T0
    #0 0x555555ce9489 in vhost_dev_free_inflight /root/smartx/qemu-el7/qemu-test/hw/virtio/vhost.c:1473
    #1 0x555555cd86eb in virtio_reset /root/smartx/qemu-el7/qemu-test/hw/virtio/virtio.c:1214
    #2 0x5555560d3eff in virtio_pci_reset hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c:1859
    #3 0x555555f2ac53 in device_set_realized hw/core/qdev.c:893
    #4 0x5555561d572c in property_set_bool qom/object.c:1925
    #5 0x5555561de8de in object_property_set_qobject qom/qom-qobject.c:27
    #6 0x5555561d99f4 in object_property_set_bool qom/object.c:1188
    #7 0x555555e50ae7 in qdev_device_add /root/smartx/qemu-el7/qemu-test/qdev-monitor.c:626
    #8 0x555555e51213 in qmp_device_add /root/smartx/qemu-el7/qemu-test/qdev-monitor.c:806
    #9 0x555555e8ff40 in hmp_device_add /root/smartx/qemu-el7/qemu-test/hmp.c:1951
    #10 0x555555be889a in handle_hmp_command /root/smartx/qemu-el7/qemu-test/monitor.c:3404
    #11 0x555555beac8b in monitor_command_cb /root/smartx/qemu-el7/qemu-test/monitor.c:4296
    #12 0x555556433eb7 in readline_handle_byte util/readline.c:393
    #13 0x555555be89ec in monitor_read /root/smartx/qemu-el7/qemu-test/monitor.c:4279
    #14 0x5555563285cc in tcp_chr_read chardev/char-socket.c:470
    #15 0x7ffff670b968 in g_main_context_dispatch (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x4a968)
    #16 0x55555640727c in glib_pollfds_poll util/main-loop.c:215
    #17 0x55555640727c in os_host_main_loop_wait util/main-loop.c:238
    #18 0x55555640727c in main_loop_wait util/main-loop.c:497
    #19 0x555555b2d0bf in main_loop /root/smartx/qemu-el7/qemu-test/vl.c:2013
    #20 0x555555b2d0bf in main /root/smartx/qemu-el7/qemu-test/vl.c:4776
    #21 0x7fffdd2eb444 in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x22444)
    #22 0x555555b3767a  (/root/smartx/qemu-el7/qemu-test/x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x5e367a)

0x604001020d18 is located 8 bytes inside of 40-byte region [0x604001020d10,0x604001020d38)
freed by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x7ffff6f00508 in __interceptor_free (/lib64/libasan.so.4+0xde508)
    #1 0x7ffff671107d in g_free (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5007d)

previously allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x7ffff6f00a88 in __interceptor_calloc (/lib64/libasan.so.4+0xdea88)
    #1 0x7ffff6710fc5 in g_malloc0 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x4ffc5)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free /root/smartx/qemu-el7/qemu-test/hw/virtio/vhost.c:1473 in vhost_dev_free_inflight
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
  0x0c08801fc150: fa fa 00 00 00 00 04 fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fa
  0x0c08801fc160: fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa 00 00 00 00 04 fa
  0x0c08801fc170: fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 01 fa fa 00 00 00 00 04 fa
  0x0c08801fc180: fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 01 fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 01
  0x0c08801fc190: fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 04 fa
=>0x0c08801fc1a0: fa fa fd[fd]fd fd fd fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fa
  0x0c08801fc1b0: fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fa
  0x0c08801fc1c0: fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd
  0x0c08801fc1d0: fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 01 fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fa
  0x0c08801fc1e0: fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd
  0x0c08801fc1f0: fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 01 fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
  Addressable:           00
  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
  Heap left redzone:       fa
  Freed heap region:       fd
  Stack left redzone:      f1
  Stack mid redzone:       f2
  Stack right redzone:     f3
  Stack after return:      f5
  Stack use after scope:   f8
  Global redzone:          f9
  Global init order:       f6
  Poisoned by user:        f7
  Container overflow:      fc
  Array cookie:            ac
  Intra object redzone:    bb
  ASan internal:           fe
  Left alloca redzone:     ca
  Right alloca redzone:    cb
==7309==ABORTING

Signed-off-by: Li Feng <fengli@smartx.com>
Message-Id: <20200417101707.14467-1-fengli@smartx.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
lacraig2 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2023
Receive/transmit/event vqs forgot to cleanup in vhost_vsock_unrealize. This
patch save receive/transmit vq pointer in realize() and cleanup vqs
through those vq pointers in unrealize(). The leak stack is as follow:

Direct leak of 21504 byte(s) in 3 object(s) allocated from:
  #0 0x7f86a1356970 (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)  ??:?
  #1 0x7f86a09aa49d (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)  ??:?
  #2 0x5604852f85ca (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c3e5ca)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:2333
  #3 0x560485356208 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c9c208)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c:339
  #4 0x560485305a17 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c4ba17)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:3531
  #5 0x5604858e6b65 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x322cb65)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:865
  #6 0x5604861e6c41 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x3b2cc41)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/qom/object.c:2102

Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20200115062535.50644-1-pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
lacraig2 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2024
Receive/transmit/event vqs forgot to cleanup in vhost_vsock_unrealize. This
patch save receive/transmit vq pointer in realize() and cleanup vqs
through those vq pointers in unrealize(). The leak stack is as follow:

Direct leak of 21504 byte(s) in 3 object(s) allocated from:
  #0 0x7f86a1356970 (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)  ??:?
  #1 0x7f86a09aa49d (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)  ??:?
  #2 0x5604852f85ca (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c3e5ca)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:2333
  #3 0x560485356208 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c9c208)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c:339
  #4 0x560485305a17 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c4ba17)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:3531
  #5 0x5604858e6b65 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x322cb65)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:865
  #6 0x5604861e6c41 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x3b2cc41)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/qom/object.c:2102

Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20200115062535.50644-1-pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
lacraig2 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2024
Receive/transmit/event vqs forgot to cleanup in vhost_vsock_unrealize. This
patch save receive/transmit vq pointer in realize() and cleanup vqs
through those vq pointers in unrealize(). The leak stack is as follow:

Direct leak of 21504 byte(s) in 3 object(s) allocated from:
  #0 0x7f86a1356970 (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970)  ??:?
  #1 0x7f86a09aa49d (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d)  ??:?
  #2 0x5604852f85ca (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c3e5ca)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:2333
  #3 0x560485356208 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c9c208)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c:339
  #4 0x560485305a17 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c4ba17)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:3531
  #5 0x5604858e6b65 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x322cb65)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:865
  #6 0x5604861e6c41 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x3b2cc41)  /mnt/sdb/qemu/qom/object.c:2102

Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <20200115062535.50644-1-pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants