Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

BUG: Timestamp.__richcmp__(dt64_unsupported_reso) #49104

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2022
Merged

BUG: Timestamp.__richcmp__(dt64_unsupported_reso) #49104

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2022

Conversation

jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

  • closes #xxxx (Replace xxxx with the GitHub issue number)
  • Tests added and passed if fixing a bug or adding a new feature
  • All code checks passed.
  • Added type annotations to new arguments/methods/functions.
  • Added an entry in the latest doc/source/whatsnew/vX.X.X.rst file if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.

@mroeschke mroeschke added Numeric Operations Arithmetic, Comparison, and Logical operations Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Timestamp pd.Timestamp and associated methods labels Oct 17, 2022
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 2.0 milestone Oct 18, 2022
@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit eb2ff31 into pandas-dev:main Oct 18, 2022
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @jbrockmendel

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the bug-ts-cmp-dt64 branch October 18, 2022 18:57
noatamir pushed a commit to noatamir/pandas that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2022
@jbrockmendel @noatamir
BUG: Timestamp.__richcmp__(dt64_unsupported_reso) (pandas-dev#49104)
f524aff
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mroeschke mroeschke mroeschke approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution Numeric Operations Arithmetic, Comparison, and Logical operations Timestamp pd.Timestamp and associated methods
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@jbrockmendel @mroeschke