Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DEPR: remove Index._is backward_compat_public_numeric_index #50052

Conversation

topper-123
Copy link
Contributor

Removes the attribute Index._is backward_compat_public_numeric_indexand related stuff. This is the last PR before actually removing Int64/UInt64/Float64Index from the code base.

This PR builds on top of #49560 (which is not yet merged), so please exclude the first commit from review of this PR.

I'd also truly appreciate if someone could review #49560, as it's quite a heavy PR with lots of dtype changes.

@topper-123 topper-123 force-pushed the Index._is_backward_compat_public_numeric_index branch 4 times, most recently from fd768f5 to 861ee2e Compare December 5, 2022 11:25
@mroeschke mroeschke added the Deprecate Functionality to remove in pandas label Dec 5, 2022
@topper-123 topper-123 added the Index Related to the Index class or subclasses label Dec 13, 2022
@topper-123 topper-123 added this to the 2.0 milestone Dec 13, 2022
@topper-123 topper-123 force-pushed the Index._is_backward_compat_public_numeric_index branch 2 times, most recently from c9f6171 to 8f846c9 Compare January 11, 2023 22:39
@topper-123 topper-123 force-pushed the Index._is_backward_compat_public_numeric_index branch from 8f846c9 to 5c96039 Compare January 14, 2023 01:01
@topper-123 topper-123 force-pushed the Index._is_backward_compat_public_numeric_index branch from 5c96039 to 21317ba Compare January 14, 2023 23:17
@topper-123
Copy link
Contributor Author

topper-123 commented Jan 15, 2023

Could someone take a review? E.g. @jbrockmendel or @mroeschke?

I've rebased this after #49560 has been merged.

After #49560 and this will have been merged, the removal of Int/Uint/Float64Index should become quite straight forward.

@@ -395,7 +392,6 @@ def _outer_indexer(
# Whether this index is a NumericIndex, but not a Int64Index, Float64Index,
# UInt64Index or RangeIndex. Needed for backwards compat. Remove this attribute and
# associated code in pandas 2.0.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Guessing this comment isn't needed anymore?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah…I’l wait a bit to see if there are more comments coming, then I’ll update.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I’ve updated this now.

Copy link
Member

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit 8849f18 into pandas-dev:main Jan 16, 2023
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks @topper-123

@topper-123 topper-123 deleted the Index._is_backward_compat_public_numeric_index branch January 16, 2023 17:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Deprecate Functionality to remove in pandas Index Related to the Index class or subclasses
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants