Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge interactive_process.py into process.py #10495

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 28, 2020

Conversation

Eric-Arellano
Copy link
Contributor

This results in fewer top-level imports in engine/, which is valuable because each file in engine/ should be seen as a top-level API for plugin authors.

This also fits into how we structure the docs, where Processes is one single page. https://www.pantsbuild.org/v2.0/docs/rules-api-process

[ci skip-rust]

[ci skip-build-wheels]

# Rust tests and lints will be skipped. Delete if not intended.
[ci skip-rust]

# Building wheels and fs_util will be skipped. Delete if not intended.
[ci skip-build-wheels]
Copy link
Sponsor Member

@stuhood stuhood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine with this, but a counterpoint is that these are very different. I'm still hoping (shallowly, it's deep in the backlog) that I can pick #8974 up.

@Eric-Arellano
Copy link
Contributor Author

but a counterpoint is that these are very different

The specific details of when to do what are very different, but the underlying motivation of "I want to run a subprocess" are the same, so I think it makes sense to group together.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 0.0% when pulling d08f89c on Eric-Arellano:interactive-process into 582f667 on pantsbuild:master.

@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano merged commit 6f48083 into pantsbuild:master Jul 28, 2020
@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano deleted the interactive-process branch July 28, 2020 19:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants