Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Require provides field for a python_distribution target #10591

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Aug 12, 2020

Conversation

Eric-Arellano
Copy link
Contributor

@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano commented Aug 11, 2020

A python_distribution target doesn't make sense without a provides field.

This also fixes some uses of the deprecated Address.parse() still being used in production.

[ci skip-rust]
[ci skip-build-wheels]

# Rust tests and lints will be skipped. Delete if not intended.
[ci skip-rust]

# Building wheels and fs_util will be skipped. Delete if not intended.
[ci skip-build-wheels]
It's possible to express a dependency via `PythonArtifact.with_binaries()`

# Rust tests and lints will be skipped. Delete if not intended.
[ci skip-rust]

# Building wheels and fs_util will be skipped. Delete if not intended.
[ci skip-build-wheels]
@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano changed the title Require provides and dependencies for a python_distribution target Require provides field for a python_distribution target Aug 11, 2020
# Rust tests and lints will be skipped. Delete if not intended.
[ci skip-rust]

# Building wheels and fs_util will be skipped. Delete if not intended.
[ci skip-build-wheels]
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 0.0% when pulling 36c8259 on Eric-Arellano:python-dist-required into b10cca1 on pantsbuild:master.

@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano merged commit aad8870 into pantsbuild:master Aug 12, 2020
@Eric-Arellano Eric-Arellano deleted the python-dist-required branch August 12, 2020 15:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants