Update project name, copyright

[qcasey]

Closes #54

Should these be merged into dev?

[gador]

The docs are build with master branch set, so the changes wont be reflected until we merge dev into master.

I'd suggest merging them into dev right now and collect any other changes we want to include in the docs and merge them later all together into master. What do you think?

[qcasey]

Yep fine by me

[dblitt]

Should we change "2021" to "2015-2022"? Obviously 2022 is the current year, and it looks like Daniel Quinn's contributions go back to December 2015 as per the git history.

[qcasey]

Yup definitely, I missed that

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1883041401

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 92.038%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 1882562900:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	3942
Relevant Lines:	4283

---

💛 - Coveralls

[dblitt]

I just changed a bunch of references to paperless-ng to paperless-ngx in README.md. Things I noticed that still need to be changed:

• Crowdin button is to the old project
• Same for docker hub
• I had issues pointing the coveralls button to the master branch, so its still the old project
• We seem to be holding on to the paperless-ng section before introducing paperless-ngx, so the links to the docs there still point to paperless-ng
• Crowdin issue (212 on paperless-ng)

[qcasey]

Thanks! I added that issue of crowdin to #1. Perhaps we should do the README and coveralls/docker button update in a new PR once those are ready.

I think we're starting with ghcr anyway (https://github.com/paperless-ngx/paperless-ngx/tree/feature-docker-build-fix)

[jovandeginste]

My remarks

[qcasey]

Not really related to this PR, but I think the README.md should be restructured. The first wall of text focuses a lot on the difference between paperless-ng and the original paperless project.

Instead we could move the paperless-ngx explainer up higher, and move the Paperless compat stuff to a ## Original Paperless Compatibility/Migration section?

[shamoon]

Not really related to this PR, but I think the README.md should be restructured. The first wall of text focuses a lot on the difference between paperless-ng and the original paperless project.

Instead we could move the paperless-ngx explainer up higher, and move the Paperless compat stuff to a ## Original Paperless Compatibility/Migration section?

Very much agree, it should be edited way down to give people a quick headline about the project, more screenshots, etc. Would you want that as part of this PR?

[qcasey]

Cool, I can draft that.

Would you want that as part of this PR?

No, this PR's scope has already creeped a bit, I'd rather start fresh :)

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new discussion or issue for related concerns.