Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Sorted bibkeys #177

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Sorted bibkeys #177

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

avonmoll
Copy link
Contributor

@avonmoll avonmoll commented May 3, 2019

Moved the translation of keys to proper bibtex keys to its own loop.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 3, 2019 •
edited

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1094

  • 3 of 3 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-2.1%) to 75.109%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1088: -2.1%
Covered Lines: 2758
Relevant Lines: 3672
💛 - Coveralls

avonmoll added a commit to avonmoll/papis that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
@avonmoll
Modernized PR papis#177
52076a1
@avonmoll avonmoll closed this Feb 24, 2020
alejandrogallo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2020
@avonmoll
Modernized PR #177 (#264)
863aebd 
* Modernized PR #177

* Changed get to getboolean for bibtex-unicode setting

* Fix for python 3 dict.keys() iterator
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Exporting --to-bibtex is semi-broken
2 participants
@avonmoll @coveralls