Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

dir restructure to support more CGP #1266

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
May 20, 2022
Merged

dir restructure to support more CGP #1266

merged 23 commits into from
May 20, 2022

Conversation

gilescope
Copy link
Contributor

@gilescope gilescope commented May 17, 2022

Readying the ground for more CGP. Fixes #1240

@chevdor
Copy link
Contributor

chevdor commented May 18, 2022

The following PR should be merged to master before we merge that one: #1265

We will then need a rebase.

polkadot-parachain/Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@joepetrowski joepetrowski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Besides some minor linking errors and the smart-contracts vs. contracts question it LGTM.

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/release.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Cargo.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@hbulgarini hbulgarini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After several back and forth, the changes looks good to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@chevdor chevdor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gilescope
Copy link
Contributor Author

bot merge

@paritytech-processbot
Copy link

Error: Checks failed for b71a6b6

@gilescope
Copy link
Contributor Author

bot merge

@paritytech-processbot
Copy link

Error: Checks failed for b71a6b6

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

polkadot-parachains folder restructuring.
9 participants