-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove MintReward and introduce PayRewardFromAccount #1654
Comments
If This is fine for now, but in the future we might want to implement a more complex |
One of solutions would be to isolate different "bridges" (i.e. pairs of |
* Ensure that inherents are first and unsigned * Update pallets/parachain-system/src/validate_block/tests.rs Co-authored-by: Sergei Shulepov <sergei@parity.io> Co-authored-by: Sergei Shulepov <sergei@parity.io>
Right now there's a single implementation of
PaymentProcedure
for thepallet-bridge-relayers
- it is theMintReward
, which just mints relayer reward. Minting is not actual anymore. Instead the reward will be paid from some account (sovereign account of the parachain at bridge hub), so havingPayRewardFromAccount
would be greatThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: