Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

some erasure-coding tweaks #143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2019
Merged

some erasure-coding tweaks #143

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2019

Conversation

rphmeier
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #88

There was some review on #56. Seems that the computation of effective shard length was broken. This PR fixes that, simplifies the encoding procedure, and adds some tests.

@rphmeier rphmeier added the A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. label Feb 19, 2019
@burdges
Copy link
Contributor

burdges commented Feb 19, 2019

LGTM :)

@rphmeier rphmeier merged commit 5c96f58 into master Feb 19, 2019
@rphmeier rphmeier deleted the rh-coding-improvements branch February 19, 2019 20:18
tomusdrw pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2021
Bumps [parity-crypto](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-common) from 0.6.1 to 0.6.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-common/releases)
- [Commits](paritytech/parity-common@parity-crypto-v0.6.1...parity-crypto-v0.6.2)

Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <support@dependabot.com>

Co-authored-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <27856297+dependabot-preview[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
A0-please_review Pull request needs code review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Optimize erasure-coding marshalling
2 participants