Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use of system_accountNextIndex as nonce #474

Closed
lemarier opened this issue Mar 11, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #476
Closed

Use of system_accountNextIndex as nonce #474

lemarier opened this issue Mar 11, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #476

Comments

@lemarier
Copy link
Contributor

lemarier commented Mar 11, 2022

Hi guys,

I'm wondering, is there any reason you are using the latest nonce instead of the rpc call system_accountNextIndexon the create_signed function?

You are currently using;

    pub async fn fetch_nonce<A: AccountData>(
        &self,
        account: &T::AccountId,
    ) -> Result<T::Index, BasicError>
    where
        <A as AccountData>::AccountId: From<<T as Config>::AccountId>,
        <A as AccountData>::Index: Into<<T as Config>::Index>,
    {
        let account_storage_entry = A::storage_entry(account.clone().into());
        let account_data = self
            .storage()
            .fetch_or_default(&account_storage_entry, None)
            .await?;
        Ok(A::nonce(&account_data).into())
    }

Something like this seems appropriate as it allows submitting multiple extrinsic for the same account id on the same block more easily, and seems more aligned with the polkadot-js ecosystem;

    /// Fetch the next nonce for the given account id.
    pub async fn fetch_next_nonce(
        &self,
        account: &T::AccountId,
    ) -> Result<T::Index, BasicError>
    where
        <T as Config>::AccountId: MaybeSerializeDeserialize,
        <T as Config>::Index: MaybeSerializeDeserialize,
    {
        Ok(self
            .rpc()
            .client
            .request("system_accountNextIndex", rpc_params![account])
            .await?)
    }

Thanks!

@ascjones
Copy link
Contributor

TBH I didn't even know this existed 🙈. This would be much better and simplify the code significantly!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants