Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Return Pending rather than loop around if no new finalized hash in submit_transaction #1378

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

jsdw
Copy link
Collaborator

@jsdw jsdw commented Jan 18, 2024

I also brazenly decided to remove the debug logging (though kept the timeout), so that it can run a bit faster again. I'm hoping that it won't pose an issue any more, but ifg it does then we can add more logging back again :)

I had a go at reworkign the code a little to simplify it, but it turned out about the same in the end! I thought about a more state-machine like approach, but it would become very verbose or end up being split across multiple functions etc, so I didn't for now.

Co-authored-by: Niklas Adolfsson <niklasadolfsson1@gmail.com>
// Keep waiting for more finalized blocks until we find it (get rid of any other block refs
// now, since none of them were what we were looking for anyway).
// Not found it! If follow ev is pending, then return pending here and wait for
// a new one to come in, else loop around and see if we get another one immediately.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: We could probably remove the else blocks to get rid of some extra indentation; up to you 👍

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did actually think abotu this, but you'd end up with a bit much for my liking in the new else thing eg

let Some((SeenBlockMarker::Finalized, block_ref)) = seen_blocks.remove(hash) else {
    seen_blocks.clear();
    if follow_ev_is_pending {
        return Poll::Pending;
    } else {
        continue;
    }
};

// ..

Unless you had another idea? :)

@jsdw jsdw marked this pull request as ready for review January 18, 2024 17:54
@jsdw jsdw requested a review from a team as a code owner January 18, 2024 17:54
@jsdw jsdw merged commit 0f48d54 into master Jan 18, 2024
11 checks passed
@jsdw jsdw deleted the jsdw-avoid-infiniteish-loops branch January 18, 2024 17:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants