Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Readthedocs using GitHub Actions v3 #594

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

martinvonk
Copy link
Collaborator

@martinvonk martinvonk commented May 10, 2023

martinvonk and others added 11 commits May 10, 2023 11:17
print the valueerrors such that the notebook can be testes
only tested once for github actions (for coverage), also is much faster due to 20 iterations
- use rtds_action on GH actions
- update conf.py to get upoaded artifacts
and update test names
@martinvonk martinvonk changed the title Rtd ghactions Create Readthedocs using GitHub Actions v3 May 10, 2023
@codacy-production
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented May 10, 2023

Coverage summary from Codacy

Merging #594 (3d60c95) into dev (1938128) - See PR on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00% (target: +0.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (1938128) 4941 3596 72.78%
Head commit (3d60c95) 4941 (+0) 3596 (+0) 72.78% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#594) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@martinvonk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Installing future (problems #578) now works again magically. While this was previously a problem whith RTD. Probably in the future we can still switch building the RTD using GitHub actions but for now we can close this again and leave things as they were.

@martinvonk martinvonk closed this May 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants