Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consensus on server-side data join #48

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 30, 2023
Merged

Conversation

benjaminsavage
Copy link
Contributor

At the last face-to-face PAT-CG call, we discussed this design dimension: the location of data join (between source and trigger events).

There was consensus that the group was potentially open to data join happening server-side, so long as the system was able to achieve our desired privacy and security goals.

At the last face-to-face PAT-CG call, we discussed this design dimension: the location of data join (between source and trigger events).

There was consensus that the group was potentially open to data join happening server-side, so long as the system was able to achieve our desired privacy and security goals.
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ This document serves to capture the dimensions with general agreement from the C

The community group has reached general agreement that the _Private Measurement Technical Specification MVP_ may include server processing dependencies, however any server architecture must achieve both a high level of security (which the editors will align with the ongoing [Threat Model](../threat-model) work) as well as ability to explain the privacy and security properties of the system to end users.

### Location of Data Join

The community group has reached general agreement that data join could potentially occur off device within a some type of server side architecture.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Want to preface this with something like:

Attribution requires joining data from the site of an impression (source) and the site of a conversion (trigger).

?

@AramZS AramZS added the call-for-consensus We are calling for participants to reach consensus. 2 weeks from being added or handled via agenda+ label Sep 11, 2023
@AramZS
Copy link
Contributor

AramZS commented Oct 30, 2023

As discussed, these PRs have been open long enough to acquire consensus that they accurately describe our conversations.

@AramZS AramZS closed this Oct 30, 2023
@AramZS AramZS reopened this Oct 30, 2023
@AramZS AramZS merged commit cd4281f into patcg:main Oct 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
call-for-consensus We are calling for participants to reach consensus. 2 weeks from being added or handled via agenda+
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants