Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

a set of generators & test cases for major POIs generated from wikipedia #71

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

blackmad
Copy link

This is partly here as a PoC

I'm curious if you'd want me to integrate it into the scripts in fuzzy-tester. It seems like it's different enough (doesn't use csvs as input) and relies on a bunch of libraries that I'm not sure if it should be integrated into that existing flow. I'm happy to make it work better with that though.

I was curious to see how we're doing on standalone major POIs so ... I built this. It mostly works. wikipedia is a pain.

@orangejulius
Copy link
Member

Once again, these are awesome.

I thought of the existing scripts in fuzzy-tester too, and honestly, this is a better place. Eventually we should move the existing scripts here.

Comment on lines 22 to 32
"expected": {
"coordinates": [
-96.34028,
30.61
],
"distanceThresh": 5000,
"properties": {
"layer": "venue"
}
}
},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We will probably want an expected name field. Right now all these tests will pass as long as any venue within 5km of the given point is returned. While that's nice for getting around minor name differences it's probably too lenient :(

@blackmad
Copy link
Author

poke

@blackmad
Copy link
Author

blackmad commented Oct 5, 2020

lmk if you want to land this?

@blackmad
Copy link
Author

blackmad commented Nov 5, 2020

@orangejulius lmk if you want to land this or I can close. Trying to clean up my backlog of open / unfinished tasks

@blackmad blackmad closed this May 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants