Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve documentation about input alignment #15

Open
ktmeaton opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Improve documentation about input alignment #15

ktmeaton opened this issue Dec 6, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@ktmeaton
Copy link
Collaborator

ktmeaton commented Dec 6, 2023

More detail is needed to explain the input alignment (--alignment alignment.fasta)!

@anagrei
Copy link

anagrei commented Apr 8, 2024

Hi,
We now use rebar and were not sure why do you recommend: "Please note that the --alignment should be aligned to the same reference as in the dataset reference.fasta! We strongly recommend nextclade." into your examples from the docs.
We've made the aligment with Augur and got less novel recombinants compared to the output with Nextclade alignment. We thought the Augur alignment should be preferred as more accurate over the Nextclade alignment.
Is it OK to take the Augur alignment or there is a special reason to use the Nextclade alignment?

Thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants