Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RC test: ph-scale 1.3.0-rc.3 #383

Closed
2 tasks done
pixelzoom opened this issue Jul 29, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

RC test: ph-scale 1.3.0-rc.3 #383

pixelzoom opened this issue Jul 29, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@pixelzoom
Copy link
Contributor

pixelzoom commented Jul 29, 2019

@KatieWoe, @ariel-phet, @arouinfar, ph-scale/1.3.0-rc.3 is ready for RC testing. This is for brand=phet only. PhET-iO and a11y are not included.

Document issues in https://github.com/phetsims/ph-scale/issues and link to this issue.

Assigning to @ariel-phet for prioritization.

General RC Test

What to Test

  • Click every single button.
  • Test all possible forms of input.
    • Test all mouse/trackpad inputs.
    • Test all touchscreen inputs.
  • If there is sound, make sure it works.
  • Make sure you can't lose anything.
  • Play with the sim normally.
  • Try to break the sim.
  • Test all query parameters on all platforms. (See QA Book for a list of query parameters.)
  • Download HTML on Chrome and iOS.
  • Make sure the iFrame version of the simulation is working as intended on all platforms.
  • Make sure the XHTML version of the simulation is working as intended on all platforms.
  • Complete the test matrix.
  • Don't forget to make sure the sim works with Legends of Learning.
  • Check this LoL spreadsheet and notify AR or AM if it not there.
  • If this is rc.1 please do a memory test.
  • When making an issue, check to see if it was in a previously published version
  • If there is a console available, check for errors and include them in the Problem Description.

Focus and Special Instructions

This is a spot check. A full test matrix is not necessary. Verify the issues in "Issues to Verify" on one or two platforms.

Issues to Verify

These issues should have the "status:ready-for-qa" label. Check these issues off and close them if they are fixed. Otherwise, post a comment in the issue saying that it wasn't fixed and link back to this issue. If the label is "status:ready-for-review" or "status:fixed-pending-deploy" then assign back to the developer when done, even if fixed.

Link(s)


FAQs for QA Members
There are multiple tests in this issue... Which test should I do first?

Test in order! Test the first thing first, the second thing second, and so on.


How should I format my issue?

Here's a template for making issues:

  <b>Test Device</b>

  blah

  <b>Operating System</b>

  blah

  <b>Browser</b>

  blah

  <b>Problem Description</b>

  blah

  <b>Steps to Reproduce</b>

  blah

  <b>Visuals</b>

  blah

  <details>
  <summary><b>Troubleshooting Information</b></summary>

  blah

  </details>

Who should I assign?

We typically assign the developer who opened the issue in the QA repository.


My question isn't in here... What should I do?

You should:

  1. Consult the QA Book.
  2. Google it.
  3. Ask Katie.
  4. Ask a developer.
  5. Google it again.
  6. Cry.


@KatieWoe
Copy link
Contributor

KatieWoe commented Jul 29, 2019

  • Win 10 chrome
  • Win 10 firefox
  • Win 10 edge

  • Mac 10.14 chrome
  • Mac 10.14 safari

  • Win 7 IE
  • Mac 10.11 safari

  • ChromeOS
  • iOS 12

@pixelzoom to approve test devices

@pixelzoom
Copy link
Contributor Author

That's definitely overkill for #383 (credits). One platform is sufficient.

I think it's also a bit much for phetsims/ph-scale#87, but probably a good idea.

@KatieWoe
Copy link
Contributor

KatieWoe commented Aug 7, 2019

QA is done

@pixelzoom
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you QA. This concludes the RC process. Production version 1.0.0 has been deployed. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants