Sharing: Albums page repeats the same results when scrolling

[Sherlock1979]

With the latest version (PhotoPrism® 210111-cc05c430-Linux-x86_64) I have noticed a bug.

I have 54 albums shared with the same share secret token. When I open the list of albums through the share token (as a guest) e.g. the https://mysite/s/token url and I keep on scrolling down then as I reach the end of the 54 albums then they start to get repeated over and over again.

In addition, previously this page probably showed the albums in alphabetical order whereas now it is a bit random.

[lastzero]

This is strange and doesn't happen on our demo as I just verified. We now also show shared folders, moments and months in the shared album overview. Are you sure you didn't share any of those as well?

[Sherlock1979]

Hi,

Yes, I am sure. These 54 albums are shared with the same token. I do not see any albums that are not shared. I see the same 54 albums getting repeated over and over again as I keep on scrolling down. So after a while I see the same album 3, 4 or more times.

[lastzero]

Does it depend on the screen size?

[Sherlock1979]

Initially I checked it on my laptop. 1366x768.

Now I checked it on my Samsung A51 android phone and the behaviour is the same.

[lastzero]

Can you test this again using today's preview image?

[Sherlock1979]

Sure I can. Once tested, is there a way to go back to the stable release? Thanks.

[lastzero]

Simply change the Docker image name back, there are no database schema updates - just UI / UX.

[lastzero]

Maybe the same albums have been shared multiple times... can you try clearing your cache including local storage?

[Sherlock1979]

I have checked with the latest preview (210117-f6081d9b-Linux-x86_64) and the behaviour has not changed.

The albums are not shared multiple times. I have queried the database with:
select share_slug from links where link_token like "mytoken";
... and each slug is there only once.

I don't think it's a browser cache issue either. As I have consistent behaviour from various browsers and computers. Also, I have been trying it in private browsing.

[lastzero]

Still can't reproduce it. Since you seem to access the db directly: Is it theoretically possible that you modified the tables / the data in any way?

[Sherlock1979]

No, I have not. Would you like me to give you some level of access to my installation?