Add first pass for Apache ActiveMQ Artemis support #1091
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
makasim
requested changes
Sep 23, 2020
|
@atrauzzi it looks good to me. There are only some minor comments |
|
Wonderful, I'll get on making the fixes. |
|
There are some CS issues and failing tests. Could you please fix them (only stuff related to your PR)? |
|
I'll check into it! |
|
@makasim - Alright, I think I've got it down now? |
makasim
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2020
|
Thank you! |
|
My pleasure, thank you for this library! 馃槃 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey @makasim! 馃憢
I've managed to put together a first draft for supporting ActiveMQ Artemis using the Enqueue STOMP driver. I have this working locally and I've done my best to stick to your code style, giving in to the odd improvement.
The biggest change I've made is to plumb the notion of broker extensions a bit further into the hierarchy of objects. I noticed in quite a few places, RabbitMQ preferences are hard-coded because there wasn't any way to check which set of extensions are desired for the connection.
Let me know what you think and note any changes or improvements you're after. I have not added tests as I am hoping to get help from you on that if it's something you want done.
Closes: #1067