add gitHub action close stale issues #17662
Conversation
Signed-off-by: FARES Nassim <nassim.fares.dz@gmail.com>
NF11
force-pushed
the
#17488_Probot_Stale_bot_should_be_replaced_with_the_Close_Stale_Issues_action
branch
from
c76d1e8
to
ecc5be6
Compare
Codecov ReportPatch coverage has no change and project coverage change:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #17662 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 52.44% 53.36% +0.91%
+ Complexity 17100 16480 -620
============================================
Files 626 627 +1
Lines 71239 68404 -2835
============================================
- Hits 37361 36503 -858
+ Misses 33878 31901 -1977
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 490 files with indirect coverage changes Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: FARES Nassim <nassim.fares.dz@gmail.com>
|
instead of marking as "wontfix", can we instead make a dedicated "stale" label? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unfortunately I do not see any use of this change. Pull-requests do not require stale management.
Could you rather help me with label:"question" as they often go stale and cause me much work to keep up to date and do manually the closing.
The message I use:
Could not reproduce, closing since no feedback or no way of reproducing was found.
Comment if you find a way to reproduce this issue, or want to re-open for a valid reason.
…be_replaced_with_the_Close_Stale_Issues_action
Co-authored-by: William Desportes <williamdes@wdes.fr>
Co-authored-by: William Desportes <williamdes@wdes.fr>
Signed-off-by: FARES Nassim <nassim.fares.dz@gmail.com>
|
Merged as 0d27683 |
Hi, this PR could help for #17488
Signed-off-by: Nassim FARES nassim.fares.dz@gmail.com
Fixes #17488