Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not consider false positives as invalid domains #1564

Merged
merged 3 commits into from May 24, 2023

Conversation

rdwebdesign
Copy link
Member

Thank you for your contribution to the Pi-hole Community!

Please read the comments below to help us consider your Pull Request.

We are all volunteers and completing the process outlined will help us review your commits quicker.

Please make sure you

  1. Base your code and PRs against the repositories developmental branch.
  2. Sign Off all commits as we enforce the DCO for all contributions
  3. Sign all your commits as they must have verified signatures
  4. File a pull request for any change that requires changes to our documentation at our documentation repo

What does this PR aim to accomplish?:

The new gravity_parseList() function was created to replace part of the gravity code, but we found a small difference in the way "false positives" are counted.

This PR changes this to achieve the same output shown by the original gravity.

How does this PR accomplish the above?:

Excluding false positives from the invalid_domains count.

Link documentation PRs if any are needed to support this PR:

none


By submitting this pull request, I confirm the following:

  1. I have read and understood the contributors guide, as well as this entire template. I understand which branch to base my commits and Pull Requests against.
  2. I have commented my proposed changes within the code and I have tested my changes.
  3. I am willing to help maintain this change if there are issues with it later.
  4. It is compatible with the EUPL 1.2 license
  5. I have squashed any insignificant commits. (git rebase)
  6. I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
  7. I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
  8. I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
  9. I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.

  • I have read the above and my PR is ready for review. Check this box to confirm

Signed-off-by: RD WebDesign <github@rdwebdesign.com.br>
Copy link
Member

@yubiuser yubiuser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the logic is now correct and also the gravity output looks good. I suggest two small comment modifications.

src/gravity-tools.c Show resolved Hide resolved
src/gravity-tools.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: RD WebDesign <github@rdwebdesign.com.br>
Signed-off-by: RD WebDesign <github@rdwebdesign.com.br>
Copy link
Member

@DL6ER DL6ER left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@DL6ER DL6ER merged commit 38335a7 into development May 24, 2023
20 checks passed
@DL6ER DL6ER deleted the tweak/false_positives branch May 24, 2023 19:17
@DL6ER DL6ER mentioned this pull request May 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants