Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement frexpl for PowerPC #250

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 9, 2022
Merged

Implement frexpl for PowerPC #250

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 9, 2022

Conversation

keith-packard
Copy link
Collaborator

Also build tests picolibc on powerpc64 and powerpc64le to make sure this doesn't regress in the future.

Closes #249

@keith-packard keith-packard force-pushed the ppc-frexpl branch 3 times, most recently from 79ac37f to e154d2b Compare February 8, 2022 05:35
Instead of forking off 9 independent workflows, serialize the whole
testing sequence into a single workflow that can share a single docker
image cache.

Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
PowerPC uses a double-double hack for long double; attempt to provide
an frexpl implementation. This is untested as I don't have any way to
run this code, all I could do is look at the bits generated by the
toolchain given various constant values.

Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
I don't know if this is correct, but at least it compiles?

Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

powerpc: frexpl fails to build
1 participant