Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not silently ignore invalid setOrder/setOrderKey parameters #16742

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 29, 2024

Conversation

blankse
Copy link
Contributor

@blankse blankse commented Mar 6, 2024

Changes in this pull request

Pimcore should give a feedback if a developer use the setOrder/setOrderKey methods wrong.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2024

Review Checklist

  • Target branch (11.1 for bug fixes, others 11.x)
  • Tests (if it's testable code, there should be a test for it - get help)
  • Docs (every functionality needs to be documented, see here)
  • Migration incl. install.sql (e.g. if the database schema changes, ...)
  • Upgrade notes (deprecations, important information, migration hints, ...)
  • Label
  • Milestone

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 13, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
3 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.8% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@lukmzig lukmzig self-assigned this Mar 29, 2024
@lukmzig lukmzig added this to the 11.3.0 milestone Mar 29, 2024
@lukmzig lukmzig merged commit f5811da into pimcore:11.x Mar 29, 2024
18 checks passed
@lukmzig
Copy link
Contributor

lukmzig commented Mar 29, 2024

@blankse thank you for the improvement

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants