Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

session, statistics: fix "data too long for column 'xxx_bound'" when analyze tables with very long strings (#28800) #29072

Closed

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Oct 25, 2021

cherry-pick #28800 to release-5.1
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/29072

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push git@github.com:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/29072:release-5.1-de9b5cbb051f

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #28793

Several columns in stats-related system tables are not long enough to hold long strings.

What is changed and how it works?

Change these columns from blob to longblob.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Fix "Data too long for column 'xxx_bound'" error when analyzing a table with strings longer than 65535 bytes.

Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <ti-srebot@pingcap.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has not been approved.

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@ti-srebot: This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by release team.
Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To merge this cherry pick, it must first be approved by the collaborators.

AFTER it has been approved by collaborators, please ping the release team in a comment to request a cherry pick review.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. label Oct 25, 2021
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Oct 25, 2021
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.1-cherry-pick labels Oct 25, 2021
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@time-and-fate you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 25, 2021
Copy link
Member

@wjhuang2016 wjhuang2016 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please resolve the conflict.

@time-and-fate
Copy link
Member

Please resolve the conflict.

We are still not sure if this PR needs to be merged because (1) this bug has a simple workaround (2) cherry-picking this will be very complicated since we need to handle the bootstrap version on 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, and master carefully.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved release-note size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.1-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants