Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: support tiflash scan in transaction with dirty data #33049

Merged

Conversation

windtalker
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #32829

Problem Summary:
This pr reverts commit b0f823c, and support tiflash scan in transaction with dirty data.

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Mar 14, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • tiancaiamao
  • wshwsh12

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 14, 2022
@windtalker
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Mar 14, 2022

Please follow PR Title Format:

  • pkg [, pkg2, pkg3]: what is changed

Or if the count of mainly changed packages are more than 3, use

  • *: what is changed

After you have format title, you can leave a comment /run-check_title to recheck it

@windtalker windtalker changed the title support tiflash scan in transaction with dirty data planner: support tiflash scan in transaction with dirty data Mar 14, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Mar 14, 2022

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Mar 14, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Mar 15, 2022
@wshwsh12
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: bd56459

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Mar 15, 2022
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@windtalker: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 9e74ce6 into pingcap:master Mar 15, 2022
@windtalker windtalker deleted the support_tiflash_scan_in_transaction branch October 23, 2023 08:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants