Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expression: remove duplicate element in json_extract function result #37118

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Aug 16, 2022

Conversation

xiongjiwei
Copy link
Contributor

@xiongjiwei xiongjiwei commented Aug 16, 2022

Signed-off-by: xiongjiwei xiongjiwei1996@outlook.com

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #37133

Problem Summary:

because of the ** in json path, the result of json_extract may contain duplicate result, we should remove it

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Aug 16, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • hawkingrei
  • xhebox

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Aug 16, 2022

@xiongjiwei xiongjiwei changed the title expression: fix json_extract function return duplicate element expression: remove duplicate element in json_extract function result Aug 16, 2022
Signed-off-by: xiongjiwei <xiongjiwei1996@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: xiongjiwei <xiongjiwei1996@outlook.com>
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: c3f96b3

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Aug 16, 2022
@xiongjiwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-check-issue-triage-complete

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 35e6465 into pingcap:master Aug 16, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Aug 16, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! New failing [1] after this pr merged.
These new failed integration tests seem to be caused by the current PR, please try to fix these new failed integration tests, thanks!

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟥 failed 1, success 5, total 6 5 min 52 sec New failing
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test ✅ all 36 tests passed 36 min Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🟢 all 17 tests passed 14 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 11 tests passed 12 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 7 min 12 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 6 min 1 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 5 min 13 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 38 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 1 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

@xiongjiwei xiongjiwei deleted the json-dup branch September 23, 2022 16:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. skip-issue-check status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants