Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: let PlanReplayerExec support multi sqls #37799

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Sep 14, 2022

Conversation

Yisaer
Copy link
Contributor

@Yisaer Yisaer commented Sep 14, 2022

Signed-off-by: yisaer disxiaofei@163.com

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #37798

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

let PlanReplayerExec support multi sqls

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: yisaer <disxiaofei@163.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Sep 14, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • hawkingrei
  • xuyifangreeneyes

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 14, 2022
Signed-off-by: yisaer <disxiaofei@163.com>
func dumpExplain(ctx sessionctx.Context, zw *zip.Writer, execStmts []ast.StmtNode, isAnalyze bool) error {
for i, stmtExec := range execStmts {
sql := stmtExec.Text()
var recordSets []sqlexec.RecordSet
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can these recordSets be reused?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's not necessary here.

Signed-off-by: yisaer <disxiaofei@163.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Sep 14, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Sep 14, 2022
@Yisaer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yisaer commented Sep 14, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 6cf1af8

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Sep 14, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit ea2ddfe into pingcap:master Sep 14, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 14, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! [2] CI still failing after this pr merged.
These failed integration tests don't seem to be introduced by the current PR.

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🔴 failed 1, success 5, total 6 23 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🔴 failed 2, success 15, total 17 9 min 29 sec Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 37 tests passed 26 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 11 tests passed 8 min 39 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 5 min 49 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 4 min 51 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 4 min 0 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 20 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 8 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants