Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ddl,executor: enhance test for auto_increment with AUTO_ID_CACHE=1 #38808

Merged
merged 54 commits into from Nov 16, 2022
Merged

ddl,executor: enhance test for auto_increment with AUTO_ID_CACHE=1 #38808

merged 54 commits into from Nov 16, 2022

Conversation

tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Add test for #38442

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Nov 2, 2022 •
edited

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • bb7133
  • hawkingrei

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Nov 2, 2022
@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2022 00:34
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Nov 2, 2022
This was referenced Nov 2, 2022
Merged
Merged
Closed
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 4, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 4, 2022
hawkingrei
hawkingrei reviewed Nov 7, 2022
View reviewed changes
executor/insert_test.go Outdated
testInsertWithAutoidSchema(t, tk)
}

func TestInsertWithAutoidSchemaCache(t *testing.T) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we create a executor/auto_id_cache folder to save the test? if the same folder saves too much test to slow the speed of the test when using the bazel.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you. Please run make bazel_prepare to update the bazel config.

tiancaiamao
tiancaiamao commented Nov 7, 2022
View reviewed changes
executor/insert_test.go
@@ -581,435 +581,6 @@ func TestAllowInvalidDates(t *testing.T) {
runWithMode("ALLOW_INVALID_DATES")
}

func TestInsertWithAutoidSchema(t *testing.T) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated and moved to https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/38808/files#diff-1c27a2956e8d617d4597580c00fb81d42bf81a4a7e726d911e11ac25ccb1e484R174

executor/insert_test.go
// than that of auto_increment_increment, the value of auto_increment_offset is ignored
// (https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/replication-options-master.html#sysvar_auto_increment_increment),
// This issue is a flaw of the implementation of MySQL and it doesn't exist in TiDB.
func TestAutoIDIncrementAndOffset(t *testing.T) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated and moved to https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/38808/files#diff-1c27a2956e8d617d4597580c00fb81d42bf81a4a7e726d911e11ac25ccb1e484R594

executor/ddl_test.go
// 2: ActionRebaseAutoID : it will drop row-id-type allocator.
// 3: ActionModifyTableAutoIdCache : it will drop row-id-type allocator.
// 3: ActionRebaseAutoRandomBase : it will drop auto-rand-type allocator.
func TestFilterDifferentAllocators(t *testing.T) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated and moved to https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/38808/files#diff-1c27a2956e8d617d4597580c00fb81d42bf81a4a7e726d911e11ac25ccb1e484R37

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Nov 7, 2022
@hawkingrei
format bazel.build
ebb3d5c 
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <wangweizhen@pingcap.com>
@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-unit-test

@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-check_dev_2

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 16, 2022
@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: b995f69

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 16, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit b117a2e into pingcap:master Nov 16, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Nov 16, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! New failing [1] after this pr merged.
These new failed integration tests seem to be caused by the current PR, please try to fix these new failed integration tests, thanks!

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟥 failed 1, success 38, total 39 22 min New failing
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🔴 failed 1, success 5, total 6 45 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🔴 failed 1, success 0, total 1 11 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🟢 all 17 tests passed 16 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 13 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 11 tests passed 10 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 7 min 36 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 7 min 3 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 14 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao deleted the autoid-test branch November 16, 2022 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bb7133 bb7133 bb7133 approved these changes

@hawkingrei hawkingrei hawkingrei approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
release-note-none size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@tiancaiamao @ti-chi-bot @bb7133 @hawkingrei @sre-bot