Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ddl: correct the remain ranges check for adding index #41460

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Feb 16, 2023

Conversation

tangenta
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #41459

Problem Summary:

The condition remains == 0 does not indicate the whole task is finished after #40411.

What is changed and how it works?

Correct the remain check code.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Feb 15, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • Benjamin2037
  • zimulala

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 15, 2023
@@ -1067,12 +1072,18 @@ func (dc *ddlCtx) writePhysicalTableRecord(sessPool *sessionPool, t table.Physic
}

for {
if startKey.Cmp(endKey) >= 0 {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we remove this check?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, kvRanges[len(kvRanges)-1].EndKey may equal to endKey.

The function splitTableRanges() doesn't handle the cases like start_key <= end_key.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is above start_key > end_key scenario for splitTableRanges() not handle?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It handles in line1082

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My question is if we send a smaller start_key to `splitTableRanges(), will it return an err?

@@ -1067,12 +1072,18 @@ func (dc *ddlCtx) writePhysicalTableRecord(sessPool *sessionPool, t table.Physic
}

for {
if startKey.Cmp(endKey) >= 0 {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it.

Copy link
Contributor

@zimulala zimulala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Feb 15, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@Benjamin2037 Benjamin2037 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Feb 15, 2023
ddl/backfilling.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tangenta
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 16, 2023
@tangenta
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 16, 2023
@tangenta
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test unit-test

@tangenta
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@tangenta
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 3a70491

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Feb 16, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 9df59ea into pingcap:master Feb 16, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.5: #41493.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tidb that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2023
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-6.6: #41494.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-cherry-pick-release-6.5 release-note-none size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Index records incomplete after adding index for a large table
5 participants