Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: don't lock schema if an error happens #41896

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 6, 2023

Conversation

wjhuang2016
Copy link
Member

@wjhuang2016 wjhuang2016 commented Mar 3, 2023

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #41797

Problem Summary:
Previously, if there was an error when updating the transaction schema, we locked the schema. But it may skip the checking because sctx.GetSessionVars().GetRelatedTableForMDL().Load(tableInfo.ID) is true.

What is changed and how it works?

Unlock the schema if an error happens.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: wjhuang2016 <huangwenjun1997@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wjhuang2016 <huangwenjun1997@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Mar 3, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • hawkingrei
  • tangenta

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed release-note-none size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed labels Mar 3, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Mar 3, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Mar 3, 2023
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/retest

1 similar comment
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/retest

@wjhuang2016
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 55232b6

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Mar 6, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit bea1a0a into pingcap:master Mar 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Mdl: result not consistent
4 participants