Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: fix global index scan, index join, and query filtering reorg partition for global index #41992

Merged

Conversation

L-maple
Copy link
Contributor

@L-maple L-maple commented Mar 7, 2023

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #41991
Issue Number: close #42065

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

  • fix global index scan when specify partition
  • fix global index join
  • fix drop/truncate partition reorg for global index

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@L-maple L-maple requested a review from a team as a code owner March 7, 2023 11:25
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Mar 7, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • Defined2014
  • mjonss

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 7, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

Hi @L-maple. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a pingcap member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@L-maple L-maple force-pushed the feature/enhance_ddl_for_global_index branch from e4e4aaa to bd5461a Compare March 7, 2023 11:26
@L-maple
Copy link
Contributor Author

L-maple commented Mar 7, 2023

/assign @mjonss

@L-maple L-maple force-pushed the feature/enhance_ddl_for_global_index branch from bd5461a to 4bac118 Compare March 7, 2023 12:03
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 7, 2023
@L-maple L-maple changed the title executor: fix global index scan when specify partition [WIP] executor: fix global index scan, index join, and partition reorg for global index Mar 7, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. and removed do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed labels Mar 7, 2023
@L-maple L-maple force-pushed the feature/enhance_ddl_for_global_index branch from 4bac118 to fec2992 Compare March 9, 2023 09:24
@L-maple
Copy link
Contributor Author

L-maple commented Mar 9, 2023

/cc @Defined2014

@L-maple
Copy link
Contributor Author

L-maple commented Mar 9, 2023

/cc @mjonss

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot requested a review from mjonss March 9, 2023 09:27
@L-maple L-maple force-pushed the feature/enhance_ddl_for_global_index branch from fec2992 to 7de3f70 Compare March 9, 2023 09:32
@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor

Does the PR ready to be reviewed? Maybe you could remove [WIP] in title.

@L-maple
Copy link
Contributor Author

L-maple commented Mar 9, 2023

WIP

Does the PR ready to be reviewed? Maybe you could remove [WIP] in title.

@Defined2014 Hi, could you run /ok-to-test?
I will contribute a littile more code for drop partition in this PR, which also has bug.

@L-maple L-maple force-pushed the feature/enhance_ddl_for_global_index branch 4 times, most recently from a2f055a to c56ccc9 Compare March 13, 2023 06:21
@L-maple L-maple force-pushed the feature/enhance_ddl_for_global_index branch from 1cecff9 to 0fa36f5 Compare April 7, 2023 11:11
@L-maple L-maple force-pushed the feature/enhance_ddl_for_global_index branch from 0fa36f5 to 3bfdcf3 Compare April 7, 2023 11:30
@L-maple
Copy link
Contributor Author

L-maple commented Apr 7, 2023

@L-maple please update/merge with upstream (pingcap/master) and resolve the ddl/db_partition_test.go conflict.

@mjonss Hi, I resolved the conflict. But later I find building failed, and I cannot understand what it means and what I should do.
image

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 7, 2023
@mjonss
Copy link
Contributor

mjonss commented Apr 12, 2023

@L-maple please update/merge with upstream (pingcap/master) and resolve the ddl/db_partition_test.go conflict.

@mjonss Hi, I resolved the conflict. But later I find building failed, and I cannot understand what it means and what I should do.

Current CI failure seems to be:

ERROR: /home/jenkins/agent/workspace/pingcap/tidb/ghpr_build/tidb/executor/BUILD.bazel:3:11: GoCompilePkg executor/executor.a failed: (Exit 1): builder failed: error executing command (from target //executor:executor) bazel-out/k8-opt-exec-2B5CBBC6/bin/external/go_sdk/builder_reset/builder compilepkg -sdk external/go_sdk -installsuffix linux_amd64 -src executor/adapter.go -src executor/admin.go -src ... (remaining 521 arguments skipped)



Use --sandbox_debug to see verbose messages from the sandbox and retain the sandbox build root for debugging

compilepkg: nogo: errors found by nogo during build-time code analysis:

executor/distsql.go:344:16: ineffectual assignment to err (ineffassign)

Basically this.

@L-maple L-maple force-pushed the feature/enhance_ddl_for_global_index branch from 3bfdcf3 to 78a5bce Compare April 13, 2023 11:46
@L-maple L-maple requested a review from mjonss April 13, 2023 11:46
@L-maple L-maple force-pushed the feature/enhance_ddl_for_global_index branch from 78a5bce to 7d28afc Compare April 13, 2023 12:06
Copy link
Contributor

@mjonss mjonss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@L-maple
Copy link
Contributor Author

L-maple commented Apr 18, 2023

@Defined2014 please help me review this PR, thanks~

Comment on lines 3768 to 3777
tmp, ok := b.is.TableByID(ret.table.Meta().ID)
if !ok {
b.err = err
return nil
}
tbl, ok := tmp.(table.PartitionedTable)
if !ok {
b.err = exeerrors.ErrBuildExecutor
return nil
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe could remove those codes and take L3786 - L3787 to L3766

Copy link
Contributor Author

@L-maple L-maple Apr 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

L3766 is actually more clean. But @mjonss told me I should check explicitly before. You can talk about it and I will follow your common advice.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I handle the err (ErrTableNotExists) and still check the type transform explicitly here. @Defined2014

Comment on lines 4591 to 4593
if !ok {
return nil, err
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Forgot set err here. By the way, I think no need check ok here, just like L4612.

Also please fix other similar codes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes👍🏻,You are right. But I find other places in this method also not set err. When the builder.err should be set?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you could change it to return nil, infoschema.ErrTableNotExists here.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The err without setting maybe always equal to nil.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

resolved

planner/core/find_best_task.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Apr 23, 2023
@Defined2014
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Apr 23, 2023

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: bafae2a

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Apr 23, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted a comment from ti-chi-bot Apr 23, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 9825089 into pingcap:master Apr 23, 2023
8 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.1: #43314.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 ok-to-test release-note-none size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
6 participants