Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: fix plugin build (#43299) #43300

Merged

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #43299

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #43298

What is changed and how it works?

Make the plugin can be loaded again. The load fail for plugin may be cause by the bug of the golang. When we have some generic definition like:

type BackupRunner = CheckpointRunner[BackupKeyType, BackupValueType]

The plugin cannot be loaded by tidb even they have all same dependencies and built together.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot mentioned this pull request Apr 21, 2023
12 tasks
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

ti-chi-bot commented Apr 21, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • hawkingrei
  • lcwangchao

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Apr 21, 2023
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator

/test unit-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Apr 22, 2023
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 6707d2f

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Apr 22, 2023
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator

/retest

1 similar comment
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator

/retest

@VelocityLight VelocityLight added cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Apr 22, 2023
@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/retest

2 similar comments
@lcwangchao
Copy link
Collaborator

/retest

@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/retest

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit ba71c5f into pingcap:release-7.1 Apr 22, 2023
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels May 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note-none size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/cherry-pick-for-release-7.1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants