Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

br: fix flaky test (#52573) #52665

Merged

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #52573

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #52547

Problem Summary:
the flaky test TestGetTSWithRetry takes too much time.

What changed and how does it work?

less retry

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Signed-off-by: Jianjun Liao <jianjun.liao@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianjun Liao <jianjun.liao@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianjun Liao <jianjun.liao@outlook.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (release-8.1@9d3f10a). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-8.1     #52665   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage               ?   73.2899%           
================================================
  Files                  ?       1470           
  Lines                  ?     436315           
  Branches               ?          0           
================================================
  Hits                   ?     319775           
  Misses                 ?      97429           
  Partials               ?      19111           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 72.3186% <100.0000%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 53.9957% <0.0000%> (?)
parser ∅ <0.0000%> (?)
br 41.0335% <0.0000%> (?)

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. label May 6, 2024
@BornChanger
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented May 7, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BornChanger, Leavrth

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented May 7, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-05-06 11:57:55.38103444 +0000 UTC m=+876829.138170013: ☑️ agreed by BornChanger.
  • 2024-05-07 07:41:56.207240618 +0000 UTC m=+947869.964376191: ☑️ agreed by Leavrth.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 238f2e6 into pingcap:release-8.1 May 7, 2024
30 of 41 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. lgtm ok-to-test release-note-none size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-8.1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants