Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

infoschema,executor: add PROCESSLIST table to INFORMMATION_SCHEMA database #7286

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2018

Conversation

coocood
Copy link
Member

@coocood coocood commented Aug 6, 2018

Cherry-pick #7236

What have you changed? (mandatory)

add PROCESSLIST table to INFORMMATION_SCHEMA database

What is the type of the changes? (mandatory)

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How has this PR been tested? (mandatory)

unit test

Does this PR affect documentation (docs/docs-cn) update? (mandatory)

NO

Does this PR affect tidb-ansible update? (mandatory)

NO

Does this PR need to be added to the release notes? (mandatory)

YES

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

Benchmark result if necessary (optional)

Add a few positive/negative examples (optional)

@coocood
Copy link
Member Author

coocood commented Aug 6, 2018

@tiancaiamao @shenli PTAL

@coocood
Copy link
Member Author

coocood commented Aug 6, 2018

/run-all-tests tikv=release-2.0 tidb-test=release-2.0

@tiancaiamao tiancaiamao changed the title infoschema,executor: add PROCESSLIST table to INFORMMATION_SCHEMA dat… infoschema,executor: add PROCESSLIST table to INFORMMATION_SCHEMA database Aug 6, 2018
@tiancaiamao
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@lysu lysu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@coocood coocood merged commit 59f7695 into pingcap:release-2.0 Aug 6, 2018
@coocood coocood deleted the memory-processlist-2.0 branch August 6, 2018 12:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants