add drawio diagram for examples

[mohammadne]

progress

• broadcast
• custom-logger
• data-channels
• data-channels-close
• data-channels-create
• data-channels-detach-create
• data-channels-detach
• data-channels-flow-control
• ice-restart
• ice-single-port
• ice-tcp
• insertable-streams
• ortc
• pion-to-pion
• play-from-disk-renegotation
• play-from-disk
• reflect
• rtp-forwarder
• rtp-to-webrtc
• save-to-disk
• simulcast
• swap-tracks
• vnet

notes

• on each example, press the architecture link to view online schema of the diagram

Reference issue

[Sean-Der]

@mohammadne fantastic work! I would love to add these. Could you also put the image in the README themselves?

A few changes

• Instead of Callee and Caller can you do Offerer and Answerer
• peer-connection -> PeerConnection
• data-channel -> data channel
• Reflect and play-from-disk has Request ICE Candidates twice

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1999 (a2b772e) into master (bb0ac79) will decrease coverage by 0.55%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head a2b772e differs from pull request most recent head 91f2cf8. Consider uploading reports for the commit 91f2cf8 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1999      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.19%   76.64%   -0.56%     
==========================================
  Files          84       85       +1     
  Lines        8783     6225    -2558     
==========================================
- Hits         6780     4771    -2009     
+ Misses       1593     1045     -548     
+ Partials      410      409       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
go	78.38% <ø> (-0.62%)	⬇️
wasm	70.95% <ø> (+0.67%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
api.go	90.00% <0.00%> (-10.00%)	⬇️
stats.go	67.85% <0.00%> (-7.15%)	⬇️
internal/mux/muxfunc.go	66.66% <0.00%> (-6.07%)	⬇️
pkg/rtcerr/errors.go	5.00% <0.00%> (-5.00%)	⬇️
networktype.go	65.95% <0.00%> (-4.96%)	⬇️
rtptransceiver.go	83.17% <0.00%> (-4.49%)	⬇️
iceserver_js.go	55.55% <0.00%> (-4.45%)	⬇️
icecredentialtype.go	71.42% <0.00%> (-3.58%)	⬇️
rtpreceiver.go	69.66% <0.00%> (-3.40%)	⬇️
iceserver.go	91.66% <0.00%> (-2.93%)	⬇️
... and 75 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bb0ac79...91f2cf8. Read the comment docs.

[mohammadne]

@mohammadne fantastic work! I would love to add these. Could you also put the image in the README themselves?

A few changes

• Instead of Callee and Caller can you do Offerer and Answerer
• peer-connection -> PeerConnection
• data-channel -> data channel
• Reflect and play-from-disk has Request ICE Candidates twice

yes, for sure

[mohammadne]

Hi @Sean-Der

I just updated the pull-request to include your requested feature.
I'll continue with this approach for all examples,
let me know if current approach needs improvement.

Thanks alot :)

[mohammadne]

HI @Sean-Der
I'm done.

can you please check it!
Thanks :)

[mohammadne]

@Sean-Der

the only remaining diagram is for vnet, because currently I'm not vrey familiar with it,
I'll create another pull-request for that in the future (maybe in the next week)

thanks for your awesome library 💯

[Sean-Der]

Fantastic work @mohammadne ! Thank you so much for contribution to Pion :)

I will review and merge first thing tomorrow. I think this will help people a lot.

[mohammadne]

Hi @Sean-Der
Is there any update about status of this pr ?
thanks :)

[mohammadne]

HI @Sean-Der
I have updated the branch to resolve the conflicts.
thanks

[Sean-Der]

Hi @mohammadne

I really regret that this didn't get in. It was my fault that I didn't do a better job of guiding this PR. I am going to work on this.

Since this PR had started Github added mermaidjs. I started porting to mermaidjs here. I put you as the author.

I started with data-channel, but I am planning on doing them all #2415. I understand if you are burned out/not interested in working on Pion (you didn't have a great experience). I would love to have you involved on this though!