as discussed on IRC #44
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
all tests succeed you should add a test that uses empty prefix and ensure it still print -L /lib |
this caused -L/lib not being printed when prefix= was used. the test was bogus anyway, because it used strcmp on non-reduced paths directly. so //lib and /lib were 2 different things, when in reality they are not.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this caused -L/lib not being printed when prefix= was used.
the test was bogus anyway, because it used strcmp on non-reduced paths
directly. so //lib and /lib were 2 different things, when in reality
they are not.