Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust consensus loggings #3046

Merged

Conversation

limebell
Copy link
Member

@limebell limebell commented Apr 3, 2023

This changes MessageLog.Add()'s return type to void (which was bool), and throws error instead if failed. Since the method was internal, skip changelog.

@limebell limebell self-assigned this Apr 3, 2023
@limebell limebell changed the title Adjust consensus loggings (0.53-maintenance) Adjust consensus loggings Apr 3, 2023
greymistcube
greymistcube previously approved these changes Apr 3, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 3, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3046 (a944c60) into 0.53-maintenance (dafff21) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 88.88%.

❗ Current head a944c60 differs from pull request most recent head c7ba08b. Consider uploading reports for the commit c7ba08b to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           0.53-maintenance    #3046      +/-   ##
====================================================
- Coverage             80.98%   80.98%   -0.01%     
====================================================
  Files                   320      320              
  Lines                 11624    11621       -3     
====================================================
- Hits                   9414     9411       -3     
  Misses                 2210     2210              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
Libplanet.Net/Consensus/Context.Async.cs 89.61% <71.42%> (ø)
Libplanet.Net/Consensus/MessageLog.cs 93.75% <85.71%> (-0.23%) ⬇️
Libplanet.Net/Consensus/ConsensusContext.cs 95.69% <100.00%> (ø)
Libplanet.Net/Consensus/Context.Mutate.cs 98.05% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
Libplanet.Net/Consensus/Context.cs 98.80% <100.00%> (ø)
Libplanet.Net/Consensus/Gossip.cs 90.76% <100.00%> (+0.84%) ⬆️

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 171 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Medium
Size       : +77 -94
Percentile : 54.2%

Total files changed: 8

Change summary by file extension:
.md : +2 -0
.cs : +75 -94

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

@limebell limebell merged commit 20bcd40 into planetarium:0.53-maintenance Apr 3, 2023
16 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants