Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scala Form/JSON API harmonisation #1221

Open
huntc opened this issue Jun 17, 2013 · 3 comments
Open

Scala Form/JSON API harmonisation #1221

huntc opened this issue Jun 17, 2013 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@huntc
Copy link
Contributor

huntc commented Jun 17, 2013

Scala Form API should be as simple and feel the same as JSON API, and validation should be shared between them

Zenexity have been commissioned to perform this work.

@ghost ghost assigned jroper Jun 17, 2013
@mandubian
Copy link
Contributor

This is cool decision and I'm very happy to see that all the work we have
done on Json validation was a pretty right way ;)

Pascal

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Christopher Hunt
notifications@github.comwrote:

Scala Form API should be as simple and feel the same as JSON API, and
validation should be shared between them

Zenexity have been commissioned to perform this work.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1221
.

@huntc
Copy link
Contributor Author

huntc commented Jun 17, 2013

@mandubian unsure about the 2.2 timeframe, but putting it there as a placeholder. :-)

@mandubian
Copy link
Contributor

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Christopher Hunt
notifications@github.comwrote:

@mandubian https://github.com/mandubian unsure about the 2.2 timeframe,
but putting it there as a placeholder. :-)

Yes I agree but it's on the roadmap at least ;)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1221#issuecomment-19565220
.

@jroper jroper removed this from the 2.3.0 milestone Apr 8, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants