feat: Initial commit

[mxschmitt]

Theres a lot missing.

I would like to have also some tests.

TODO:

• add bundle system (not sure which one. Normal tsc should be enough. maybe https://github.com/zeit/ncc)
• add missing types
• adjust license, so its okay to use. Needs to be still there afaik and then our one.
• clarify if Yarn or NPM

[mmarkelov]

@mxschmitt I'm going to start work on it. So maybe we can push some kind of init commit?)

[mxschmitt]

@mxschmitt I'm going to start work on it. So maybe we can push some kind of init commit?)

we if its okay for you you can either push into that branch/PR or we merge this one already.

[mmarkelov]

@mxschmitt ok! I'll push changes into this branch)

[mmarkelov]

We should select yarn or npm to use. Cause right now there is yarn build command, but also there is package-lock.json file

[mxschmitt]

yee, thats why I mentioned it in the TODOs. Im ok with both, lets maybe use npm?

[mmarkelov]

@mxschmitt I suppose using npm is better, cause we are using it for jest-playwright, so we should be consistent

[mxschmitt]

I think we have to mention it in the LICENSE, that his is a forked version of the jest-dev-server.

btw. what do you think about the name jest-process-manager?

[mmarkelov]

I think we have to mention it in the LICENSE, that his is a forked version of the jest-dev-server.

IDK if we should mention it in LICENSE, of course we must put it in README, I think it will be enough

what do you think about the name jest-process-manager?

That's totally fine for me ;)

[mxschmitt]

I think we can merge and release / test a version.

But for the license we have to include the old one as mentioned here: https://github.com/smooth-code/jest-puppeteer/blob/master/packages/jest-dev-server/LICENSE

[mmarkelov]

I think we can merge and release / test a version.

Yeah! I think so.

We can mention them in our LICENSE, but IDK how)

[mxschmitt]

I think we can merge and release / test a version.

Yeah! I think so.

We can mention them in our LICENSE, but IDK how)

we have to include a copy of their license and then our license (MIT).

[mmarkelov]

we have to include a copy of their license and then our license (MIT).

@mxschmitt how we should include copy of their license? Like put it in ORIGINAL_LICENSE?

[mxschmitt]

Okay, merged for now. How should we go on? Maybe fix the README and then a first release / make it public?

[mmarkelov]

@mxschmitt yeah! I think we should fix the Readme and we are ready to go. Also it will be nice to ask @thernstig to open issues from jest-dev-server

[thernstig]

Added issue #3 and #4

Did not add one for argos-ci/jest-puppeteer#340 since I assume you already fixed this.

Note: I have not been able to test this package yet obviously, so it's possible you can immediately close some of the issues above if they are already considered in this new package.

[mmarkelov]

@thernstig thanks a lot!