Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance Options Buffer for >16 Message Unmarshaling #524

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 12, 2024

Conversation

jkralik
Copy link
Member

@jkralik jkralik commented Jan 12, 2024

Previously, the connection was being closed due to unmarshaling failures when more than 16 options were included in the message. This fix addresses the issue by increasing the buffer size to accommodate a higher number of options.

Previously, the connection was being closed due to unmarshaling failures when
more than 16 options were included in the message. This fix addresses the issue
by increasing the buffer size to accommodate a higher number of options.
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jan 12, 2024

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (39a46aa) 73.95% compared to head (a5adb4f) 74.06%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #524      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.95%   74.06%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          71       71              
  Lines        5844     5853       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits         4322     4335      +13     
+ Misses       1133     1125       -8     
- Partials      389      393       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jkralik jkralik merged commit c61c648 into master Jan 12, 2024
12 checks passed
@jkralik jkralik deleted the jkralik/fix/unmarshal-more-than-16-options branch January 12, 2024 19:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants