Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

russian.lbx update #341

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

russian.lbx update #341

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

odomanov
Copy link
Contributor

I also added bibstrings for Japanese. Could you add their support to biblatex?

@plk
Copy link
Owner

plk commented Sep 29, 2015

Manually merged into biblatex dev branch, thanks.

@plk plk closed this Sep 29, 2015
@odomanov
Copy link
Contributor Author

odomanov commented Nov 4, 2015

Probably you didn't add the support for Japanese (am I right that this should be done in biblatex?).
I've got the following compilation error with biblatex 3.1 and 3.2:

(c:/texlive/texmf-local/tex/latex/biblatex/lbx/russian.lbx
File: russian.lbx 2015/11/02 v3.2 biblatex localization (PK/JW/AB)


! Package xkeyval Error: `langjapanese' undefined in families `blx@lbx'.

plk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2015
@plk
Copy link
Owner

plk commented Nov 4, 2015

Ah, yes, sorry. Please try 3.2 from SF again

@odomanov
Copy link
Contributor Author

odomanov commented Nov 4, 2015

Sorry :) There is another string --- fromjapanese.

plk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2015
@plk
Copy link
Owner

plk commented Nov 4, 2015

Sorry - please pull 3.2 again.

@odomanov
Copy link
Contributor Author

odomanov commented Nov 4, 2015

SF probably hasn't updated yet, but the repo version works fine. Thanx.

@moewew moewew added the localisation concerns lbx files or localisation in general label Jun 8, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
localisation concerns lbx files or localisation in general
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants