Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance Color Picker to allow hex, rgb or rgba #3915

Closed
PodsBot opened this issue Jan 6, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Enhance Color Picker to allow hex, rgb or rgba #3915

PodsBot opened this issue Jan 6, 2017 · 6 comments
Labels
Type: Enhancement Enhancements to features that already exist, but are not major additions

Comments

@PodsBot
Copy link
Collaborator

PodsBot commented Jan 6, 2017

Enhance Color Picker to allow hex, rgb or rgba submitted via Slack by jimtrue

@jimtrue
Copy link
Contributor

jimtrue commented Apr 9, 2017

Ideally, change the color picker to also allow transparency, as an example:
https://wordpress.org/plugins/acf-rgba-color-picker/

Also, possibly give the ability to lock it down to just the color palette portion of the color picker as well.

@jimtrue jimtrue added the Type: Enhancement Enhancements to features that already exist, but are not major additions label Oct 18, 2017
@jimtrue jimtrue added this to the Pods Future Release milestone Oct 18, 2017
@zackpyle
Copy link

zackpyle commented May 9, 2019

Is there an update on allowing rgba for the color picker? Wondering why it was closed last year. Thanks! :)

@jimtrue
Copy link
Contributor

jimtrue commented May 9, 2019

@zackpyle If you notice, that was closed for 'Need Votes', Add a thumbs up to the original request to add your vote to this feature. We closed pretty much all enhancement or feature requests and shifted them to 'Need Votes' so we could get an idea of what our folks are actually wanting us to focus on.

At present for 2.8, all of the fields are being revisited in React, so this might be a moot point when @pglewis gets to that field if he finds one that offers the full flexibility, great :)

@zackpyle
Copy link

zackpyle commented May 9, 2019

@jimtrue Thanks I did see that, but I wasn't sure if "Needs Votes" still counted after it was Closed.

And sounds good. Thanks for the update :) Saw the 2.8 announcement on fb. Excited to see it!

@pglewis
Copy link
Contributor

pglewis commented May 9, 2019

Noted on #4648 to make sure this doesn't get forgotten

@zackpyle
Copy link

zackpyle commented May 9, 2019

@pglewis Thanks!

@sc0ttkclark sc0ttkclark modified the milestones: Backlog, Backlog Archive Sep 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Enhancement Enhancements to features that already exist, but are not major additions
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants