Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Async parquet: Decode parquet on a blocking thread pool #15083

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2024

Conversation

ritchie46
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added enhancement New feature or an improvement of an existing feature python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars labels Mar 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.43750% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.03%. Comparing base (f08914b) to head (d21b256).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
crates/polars-io/src/parquet/read_impl.rs 98.43% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15083      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.04%   81.03%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1338     1338              
  Lines      173771   173828      +57     
  Branches     2456     2456              
==========================================
+ Hits       140832   140868      +36     
- Misses      32471    32493      +22     
+ Partials      468      467       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted Ready for implementation enhancement New feature or an improvement of an existing feature python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants