Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ntr: small vegetative cell with advanced mitosis and M phase arrest #2818

Closed
ValWood opened this issue Sep 20, 2016 · 9 comments
Closed

ntr: small vegetative cell with advanced mitosis and M phase arrest #2818

ValWood opened this issue Sep 20, 2016 · 9 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ValWood
Copy link
Member

ValWood commented Sep 20, 2016

This term is analogous to
the inviable elongated cell with mitotic transition delay and cell cycle arrest in M-phase

it will be a child of both
FYPO:0001046 premature mitosis
and
FYPO:0000648 viable small vegetative cell
which are often concurrently annotated (see comment)

This more precise phenotype will be useful. IIRC we could not put FYPO:0000648 viable small vegetative cell as an output or FYPO:0001046 premature mitosis because cells can be small also if entering G0 or grown on non-rich media?

@mah11
Copy link
Member

mah11 commented Sep 20, 2016

IIRC we could not put FYPO:0000648 viable small vegetative cell as an output [of] FYPO:0001046 premature mitosis because cells can be small also if entering G0 or grown on non-rich media?

No, smallness, like everything else, is defined relative to wild type under the same conditions.

As noted in #2544, we haven't linked FYPO:0000648 to FYPO:0001046 because we're waiting for you and Jacky to figure out whether there's any way to define premature mitosis using criteria other than cell size, or any way to get a small cell other than by premature mitosis.

We'll need to know that for this ticket, too, to tell whether the new term will simply be "small vegetative cell with cell cycle arrest in M phase" or if the "premature mitosis" part actually adds any further distinction.

There's more background in an older ticket in SourceForge (one of the few that missed out on the move to GitHub) - https://sourceforge.net/p/pombase/fission-yeast-phenotype/1770/

@ValWood ValWood self-assigned this Sep 21, 2016
@ValWood
Copy link
Member Author

ValWood commented Sep 21, 2016

you can get small cells in G0 too I think sometimes it is difficult to differentiate in a mixed population.....

But I see what you mean
"small vegetative cell with cell cycle arrest in M phase" is used to infer "premature mitosis"
but that might be the 'normal' size, and hence time to divide in certain nutrients....

leave this with me. I'll get it eventually....

not to self: I'm not even sure about the viability here.....

@JackyVH
Copy link
Collaborator

JackyVH commented Sep 21, 2016

I think a premature mitosis could also be defined as a shorter than normal G2 phase
Jacky

Sent from my iPhone

On 20 Sep 2016, at 17:51, Midori Harris <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

IIRC we could not put FYPO:0000648 viable small vegetative cell as an output [of] FYPO:0001046 premature mitosis because cells can be small also if entering G0 or grown on non-rich media?

No, smallness, like everything else, is defined relative to wild type under the same conditions.

As noted in #2544#2544, we haven't linked FYPO:0000648 to FYPO:0001046 because we're waiting for you and Jacky to figure out whether there's any way to define premature mitosis using criteria other than cell size, or any way to get a small cell other than by premature mitosis.

We'll need to know that for this ticket, too, to tell whether the new term will simply be "small vegetative cell with cell cycle arrest in M phase" or if the "premature mitosis" part actually adds any further distinction.

There's more background in an older ticket in SourceForge (one of the few that missed out on the move to GitHub) - https://sourceforge.net/p/pombase/fission-yeast-phenotype/1770/

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/2818#issuecomment-248361738, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANVVaOxGRfj1MCfmcPoBgPQLCeOetPImks5qsA8KgaJpZM4KBsQR.

The Francis Crick Institute Limited is a registered charity in England and Wales no. 1140062 and a company registered in England and Wales no. 06885462, with its registered office at 215 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE.

@mah11
Copy link
Member

mah11 commented Sep 21, 2016

you can get small cells in G0 too

But (if I understand correctly) that's a normal feature of G0, and therefore not what we're trying to represent with the implicitly-abnormal "small cell".

"small vegetative cell with cell cycle arrest in M phase" is used to infer "premature mitosis"
but that might be the 'normal' size, and hence time to divide in certain nutrients..

Always, always compare to wild type cells treated the same way. If you have an experiment that doesn't show wt you may be stuffed, unfortunately ...

@ValWood
Copy link
Member Author

ValWood commented Sep 21, 2016

Yes but I think sometimes you might have small cells because some have entered G0, but you didn't know this was the reason they were small. This was my worry. I think I have seen such situations ....

@mah11
Copy link
Member

mah11 commented Sep 21, 2016

If all you have is pictures of cells where the mutant ones look smaller than the wild type ones, you have to just annotate to a "small cell" term because that's what the pictures show. The annotation could be removed later if additional evidence reveals that they've entered G0, and we could add a "premature G1 to G0 transition" term if it's warranted for those cases.

@ValWood
Copy link
Member Author

ValWood commented Sep 22, 2016

curs/9442751303a5f327

@mah11
Copy link
Member

mah11 commented Dec 11, 2019

anything to do for this, or should we close it?

@ValWood
Copy link
Member Author

ValWood commented Dec 11, 2019

Lets close

@ValWood ValWood closed this as completed Dec 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants