Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Update README stating specific requirements for SIGNING_KEY #1217

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2020

Conversation

bradjones1
Copy link
Contributor

Makes clear it must be an EC key and also that it must be present in the authentication service, if run separately.

Checklist:

  • add related issues
  • updated docs
  • updated unit tests
  • updated UPGRADING.md
  • ready for review

Makes clear it must be an EC key and also that it must be present in the authentication service, if run separately.
@bradjones1 bradjones1 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 5, 2020 20:58
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Aug 5, 2020

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@codeclimate
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Aug 5, 2020

Code Climate has analyzed commit 76258fa and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 5, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1217 into master will increase coverage by 0.0%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1217   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    59.0%   59.1%           
======================================
  Files         102     102           
  Lines        7661    7661           
======================================
+ Hits         4525    4528    +3     
+ Misses       2742    2739    -3     
  Partials      394     394           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/storage/redis/redis.go 77.2% <0.0%> (+1.2%) ⬆️

Copy link
Contributor

@desimone desimone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bradjones1 LGTM. Thanks for specifying that. We sort of gloss over the althorithim requirements in https://www.pomerium.io/docs/reference/getting-users-identity.html#prerequisites

(I'd like to support ed in the near future, but RSA is just too slow).

@desimone
Copy link
Contributor

desimone commented Aug 5, 2020

@bradjones1 Do you mind signing the contributor agreement? Otherwise, LGTM!

@desimone desimone added the docs Docs update required label Aug 5, 2020
@desimone desimone merged commit 9af93ff into pomerium:master Aug 5, 2020
@desimone desimone added this to the 0.10.0 milestone Aug 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Docs update required
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants