Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Qc bonobo ghost #1370

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2022
Merged

Conversation

kuhlwilm
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 23, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 99.84% // Head: 99.94% // Increases project coverage by +0.10% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (f7b2324) compared to base (0b338dd).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1370      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.84%   99.94%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         113      109       -4     
  Lines        3838     3668     -170     
  Branches      524      487      -37     
==========================================
- Hits         3832     3666     -166     
+ Misses          3        1       -2     
+ Partials        3        1       -2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
stdpopsim/catalog/PanTro/demographic_models.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
stdpopsim/qc/PanTro.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
stdpopsim/qc/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
stdpopsim/__init__.py
stdpopsim/__main__.py
stdpopsim/species.py
stdpopsim/annotations.py
stdpopsim/genetic_maps.py

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@kuhlwilm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@petrelharp
I think I'm done with the QC - the original and QC model are equal (after some debugging of my QC model and one correction to the original model). One of the checks was not successful, but I'm not sure I can do anything there.
Best,
Martin

@petrelharp
Copy link
Contributor

Wow, this is a complex one! Thanks a bunch! And - all of the checks seem to have passed, happily. 🎉 !!

@petrelharp petrelharp merged commit 1da1bdb into popsim-consortium:main Sep 25, 2022
@nspope nspope mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants