New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Runner should not stop when an error arrises #3360
Comments
This is also not strictly this computer. This happens on all computers I've tried on, including Mac. |
Same here.
|
@chrisron95 Yeah this makes sense. We will try to enhance runner with this suggestion. I will keep you updated here about this. |
To edit the tests catching this Postman incorrect behaviour is not the right approach! |
Is there any option to resolve this issue? Can we add relevant scripts in "Tests" section to handle these type of errors? In my single collection, I have 400+ requests. It stops after 35 requests, sometimes after 40 requests. |
Any news about this issue? It was created in 2017 and several years have passed already. If this is not going to be fixed ever due to the "Low" priority then maybe a professional could give us a pertinent solution. Thanks! |
I would add my 5 cents for option "halt on errors". |
Much needed feature in 2021 ! |
@giridharvc7 If you're going to close #10391 as a duplicate of this one, then could you please provide an update here? These early exits during long collection runs are quite frustrating, and this issue is now over 4 years old... |
Any updates on this issue? |
Awaiting for the resolution. Much needed feature.! |
Any updates on this issue? |
Awaiting resolution. Much needed feature! |
I see this will likely never be fixed since it's been outstanding for 5 years. I can't imagine having issues that impacts our customers for 5 years and just ignoring their countless pleas for a fix. Bad business. |
@dcstamps Apologies for your experience and for not getting back on this thread sooner! I can definitely see how an error might force you to restart the run and you might end up losing time over it. We have taken note of this feature request! I will update this thread as soon as we have some news on this. If you would like to talk to me 1:1 about the above issue or any other similar issues you are facing- here is a link to my calendar that you can use to schedule time with me. |
Any updates? |
Hi Postman SupportI have experienced that Postman has implemented test run limitation from version 10Because of that I will not use Postman in the feature any more.Sorry but that was very destructive decision and you will lose a lot of customers.It's so sad.I will close this issue soonBest regards Mirsad Am 21.03.23, 18:48 schrieb Luciana ***@***.***>:
@dcstamps Apologies for your experience and for not getting back on this thread sooner! I can definitely see how an error might force you to restart the run and you might end up losing time over it.
We have taken note of this feature request! I will update this thread as soon as we have some news on this.
If you would like to talk to me 1:1 about the above issue or any other similar issues you are facing- here is a link to my calendar that you can use to schedule time with me.
Any updates?
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
@mirsoo You can't do that if you're not a maintainer or the Issue author. |
Hi All, I have provided some updates regarding this issue here Please do take a look and add your thoughts. @mirsoo Could you drop us a note at help@postman.com regarding the limits. Our goal is to enable your workflows as seamlessly as possible. If you wish to discuss this instead, please use this calendly link to schedule some time with me. Regards, |
Hi Malvikathat's great.Hopefully Postman will implement this feature soon!I will set an appointment regarding run limitations with you.Best regards MirsadAm 22.03.23, 10:25 schrieb Malvika Chaudhary ***@***.***>:
Hi All,
I have provided some updates regarding this issue here
Please take a look and add your thoughts.
@mirsoo Could you drop us a note at ***@***.*** regarding the limits. Our goal is to enable your workflows as seamlessly as possible. If you wish to discuss this instead, please use this calendly link to schedule some time with me.
Regards, Malvika
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hi All, Glad to inform everyone that this improvement has been released in the latest Postman release (version 10.13). You can now customize the Collection Runner to continue to run if an error occurs. The setting will be checked by default i.e. by default Runner will stop the execution in case of an error. If you wish to continue runner to execute, you can uncheck this setting and Postman will remember it throughout your session for all subsequent runs unless you change it. Hope this helps your workflows. Once again, thanks a lot for sharing your feedback on this. Please note: The Postman version update is being rolled out, you will get it in the next 1-2 days if you haven't already. Cheers, |
This is great news, thank you so much!
…On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 1:47 AM Malvika Chaudhary ***@***.***> wrote:
Closed #3360
<#3360> as
completed.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3360 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMSPU6YE3PAJQY3VEQJWEODXB5377ANCNFSM4DWEYA6Q>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
|
Awesome! Thank you very much @malvikach ! |
Wonderful - thanks @malvikach . Just used it. Remembers my turning it off too -yay! |
App Details:
Issue Report:
always there
The runner should keep going through tests even when a simple error arrises.
If we make a call that results in an html error page (normal html page, starts with ), the runner just stops dead in it's tracks and logs in the devtools "unexpected token". It's very frustrating when I have a run that's been going for a while and an error comes up that stops the runner before it's finished and I have to start over. This error should not stop the runner. I could understand it logging the error, stating that there was an error, and then skipping that call, but the runner should not stop. I have logic in my runner tests that deal with this error, however it's useless since the runner itself won't let it continue.
This also happens if it's searching for (in my case) "_id" and it's not there. This rarely stops it, but every once in a while it does.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: